My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00156
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00156
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:02:52 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:40:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153721
Contractor Name
Lyons, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
5
County
Boulder
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Backwash water and clarifier sludge are drained to a reclamation pond on the plant site. <br />Operators report that: <br /> <br />Sludge was removed from this site in 1988 by Town staff. <br /> <br />A small amount of supernatant water is pumped to the clarifier for reuse. <br /> <br />The clarifier is purged of sludge using a drain valve once per shift on high- <br />production days. <br /> <br />In light of the above information, sludge production and handling was not addressed in this <br />preliminary evaluation. It should be pointed out, however, that due to the increased emphasis <br />on Giardia cyst removal in modern water treatment facilities, the reuse of backwash water <br />which may contain concentrated amounts of cysts should be carefully considered. (Note: The <br />Town has a discharge permit in effect for the WTP) <br /> <br />Plant Operations and Staffinll <br /> <br />Condition of equipment, piping, controls, and instrumentation was observed during the <br />field visit. Knowledge of the operator with regard to experience, understanding of the plant's <br />capabilities, and level of effort was also observed on the plant tour and in subsequent <br />discussions . <br /> <br />In summary, the following was noted: <br /> <br />1. Instrumentation, such as storage tank level indicator and certain flow meters, were <br />inoperative. Chemical feed equipment, chemical dosage instrumentation, and chemical <br />storage space needed improvement. Some water sampling points need to be added <br />and/or relocated. In general, chemical addition process control could be improved. <br /> <br />2. The operator reported that they try to keep key system components and problem <br />equipment in stock and that they note in a separate log form when preventative <br />maintenance is done. Corrosion of piping and valves in the pipe room near the <br />clearwell was noted. Corrosion control of existing piping and valves could be done by <br />using a repainting program. In general, maintenance needs improvement to preserve <br />facilities already in place. There seems to be no plan to operate the WTP during <br />equipment failure, or during interruptions in electric power. <br /> <br />3. Personnel are well aware of most deficiencies. All personnel interviewed are cross- <br />trained and have responsibilities for operation and maintenance of the water distribution <br />system, the sewer collection system, and the wastewater treatment plant, as well as the <br />water treatment plant. Lack of manpower and funding are primary concerns. <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.