Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A.6. SEISMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION. <br /> <br />1. General. A general review of published literature was conducted to <br />provide a basis for determining the seismicity of the Reservoir No. 6 site. The <br />pertinent data Is summarized In the following section. This data Is current only <br />up to 1976 but Is recent enough to provide a sound basis for determining the <br />site seismicity. <br /> <br />2. Historical Data. Colorado Is considered a region of minor earthquake <br />activity (I,2). Eastern Colorado Is ne9rly aseismic; whereas, the northwest and <br />southwest portions of the state and the south central areas of the state are <br />considered Inactive areas where no earthquakes have occurred hlstorlcaliy. Most <br />of the recorded earth Quake shocks have been centered west of the Rocky <br />Mountain Front Range. Epicenters of historical earthquakes larger than Modified <br />Mercalll Intensity II are shown In Table No. 1 (2,3,4). The data tabulated shows <br />no confirmed earthquakes larger than Intensity VII within 200 miles of the site. <br />Twenty-six (26) earthquakes of Intensity V to VII have been recorded within 100 <br />miles of the site. The nearest known earthquake was recorded In the Greeley <br />area on May 26, 1969 with a Modified Mercalll Intensity IV. The most recent <br />earthquake which has produced damage was on August 9, 1967 located In the <br />Denver area and lIsted as an Intensity VII earthquake. This earthquake was one <br />of a series of earthquakes centered In the Denver area which are believed to <br />have occurred due to Injection of watlte fluids In a deep well at the Rocky <br />Mountain Arsenal. <br /> <br />3. PublIshed Seismic Risk Zones. The seismic risk zones published by the <br />Uniform Building Code as shown on Figure 3 Indicates Colorado Is In the Zone 1 <br />category which Indicates minor seismic risk corresponding to Modified Mercalll <br />Intensities V to VI. Seismicity maps produced for the U.S. Geological Survey (6) <br />shows the site to be located In a zone which has a maximum potential Intensity <br />VII. <br /> <br />The Applied Technology Council presented peak acceleration coefficient maps and <br />seismic hazard concepts which place the site In a zone with an assigned <br />horizontal acceleration at the bedrock surface equivalent to 0.06 g. <br /> <br />4. Ground Motion. Based on the Intensity IV earthquake recorded In the <br />Greeley area and considering the attenulltlon to the site as proposed by Gupta & <br />Nuttll (7), a MM Intensity III would be felt at the site. Based on the Intensity <br />VII earthquake recorded In Denver In 1967 and considering the attenuation to the <br />site, a MM Intensity V would be felt at the dam site. Using correlations of <br />Trlfunac & Brady (8), a MM Intensity V would cause a maximum horizontal <br />ground acceleration at the site of 0.0378 g. <br /> <br />6. Desl~n Coefficient. During the final design, the stability of the Reservoir <br />No. 6 dam during an earthquake will be determined using a O.lg horizontal <br />seismic coefficient. This coefficient IS conservative based on the lIterature <br />review and the Information provided In the previous sections. The recommended <br />seismic coefficient for this area for ptleudo-statlc stability analysis of earth <br />dams by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (6) Is 0.06 g. This coefficient was <br />Increased to provide what Is considered to be a more conservative approach <br /> <br />PAGE 8 <br />Chapter V - W~. 8 l'eulbUlty <br />