Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />sand; to ~' = 400 and C' = 0 for the silty sand with gravel. Because of <br />the granular nature of the materials comprising the embankment, soil cohesion <br />should not be depended on for shearing resistance. The shear strength <br />parameters chosen to represent the enti re embankment were ~ 0 = 380; wi th <br />CO = O. <br /> <br />2.3.4 <br /> <br />Failure Surface <br /> <br />There are two common failure surface configurations used for stability <br />analysis. A circular arc failure surface is more applicable for analyzing <br />essenti ally homogeneous or zoned embankments, founded on bedrock or thi ck <br />deposits of fine-grained materials. A non-circular failure surface, described <br />by linear segments, is generally more applicable for zoned embankments on <br />foundations containing one or several horizontal or nearly horizontal weak <br />layers. Non-circular failure surfaces can also be used for relatively <br />homogeneous dams, which contain continuous well-defined horizontal weak layers. <br /> <br />The failure surfaces shown on Figure V.2 are critical slip planes, located by <br />a search routi ne in the computer program "PCSTABL5". The top of the sl ip <br />surfaces were confined to near the dam crest to represent a critical failure <br />which could result in loss of the reservoir. When the phreatic surface is <br />modeled as being coincidental with the slope face, smaller failure surfaces <br />near the toe of the slope may in fact be sl i ghtly more cri ti cal than the <br />larger surfaces encompassing the entire slope. However, the risk of total <br />embankment failure as a result of these surficial slumps or ravelling is less <br />than the risk associated with an entire slope failure. <br /> <br />2.3.5 <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />For the purpose of slope stabil i ty analysi s, the factor of safety is defi ned <br />as the ratio of total avail abl e shear strength of the soil to shear stress <br />required to maintain equilibrium along a potential surface of sliding. The <br />factor of safety indicates a relative measure of stability for various <br />conditions, but does not precisely indicate the actual margin of safety; <br /> <br />-54- <br />