My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00137
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00137
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:09 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153467
Contractor Name
Greeley, City of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Weld
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />be classified as semi-pervious, with poor drainage capability. Thus, the <br />rapid drawdown phreatic surface, shown on Figure V.2, is probably more <br />realistic than conservative. <br /> <br />2.3.3 <br /> <br />Material Properties <br /> <br />The major soil properties used in stability analyses are density and shear <br />strength. Field and laboratory soil tests, as well as past experience with <br />similar materials, were employed to arrive at the Twin lakes Dam embankment <br />material properties shown on Figure V.2. <br /> <br />Densities obtained from relatively undisturbed Shelby tube samples of the <br />embankment, and field tests using a nuclear density gage, indicate that the <br />embankment materials were poorly compacted. This loose state was modeled in <br />the stabi 1 i ty analysi s by usi ng soi 1 densiti es whi ch are approximately 90 <br />percent of standard Proctor maximum density for the embankment material; <br /> <br />Determination of the shear strength parameters is the most important phase of <br />a stability analysis. It is difficult, however, to obtain representative <br />samples, avoid sample disturbance, simulate external loading and internal pore <br />pressure conditions, and avoid inherent test error in the testing methods. It <br />is typically impossible to obtai n samples that truly represent the range of <br />materials existing in the field. For these reasons, shear strength parameters <br />are generally determined from samples representing extremes, and parameters <br />are selected within the range. Hence, a significant amount of judgment and <br />experience play an extremely important role in the evaluation of laboratory <br />test resul ts to ensure that the parameters chosen are representati ve of the <br />materials in place. <br /> <br />Exploratory borings in Twin Lakes Dam revealed a reasonably homogeneous <br />embankment, consi sting of silty sand with gravel, founded on bedrock. In <br />drill hole TL-l, however, a 5-foot layer of silty sand with organics was <br />di scovered at the embankment-bedrock contact. The range of shear strength <br />parameters obtained for the dam materials was 0' (effective angle of <br />internal friction) = 350 and c' (effective cohesion) = 1 psi for the silty <br /> <br />-52- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.