My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FS0025X Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
FS0025X Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2014 4:25:13 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:37:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0025X
Contractor Name
Upper Gunnison Uncompahgre Basin CWRPDA 1989
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Archuleta
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
803
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
intended to be maintained primarily 6y releases from Green Mountain and Ruedi <br />Reservoirs. Blue Mesa Reservoir is being discussed as an additional source of <br />water if the supply from the other reservoirs is insufficient.. The instream <br />flow requirement at Westwater is still under study: It was therefore <br />considered premature to model releases from Blue Mesa Reservoir for this <br />purpose and this pote�tial demand on Gunnison Basin water was not modeled. <br />3.6 TREATMENT OF CONDITIONAL WATER RIGHTS DECREES <br />A large number of conditional water rights decrees have been adjudicated <br />in the Gunnison Basin. It is reasonable to assume that some of these decrees <br />will be perfected to some degree in the future, but that others will not. <br />Based on the future water demand forecasts developed during the study, on <br />discussions with members of the Technical Steering and Advisory Committees, <br />and on professional judgement> a list of conditional decrees to be included in <br />the model was developed. Omission of conditianal water rights from the list <br />carries no legal implication regarding those rights. In fact, there are many <br />reasons why a water supplier might legitimately maintain diligence on <br />conditional water rights in amounts greater than included in this study's <br />model. These reasons include but are not limited to the following: <br />o The water supplier may aot have confidence in the reliability or <br />longevity of its present water supply system.and may be considering <br />the implementatian of a new type of system. Furthermore, it may be <br />difficult to obtain changes in its present decrees to support the <br />new system. An example would be the conversion of a groundwater <br />system that is presently experiencing water quality or water table <br />drawdown problems to a surface water storage system. <br />o The water supplier could have conditional decrees that may prove <br />difficult to perfect in their present form but the possibility of <br />transferring them to some other project, other uses, or other <br />purpose may be feasible. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.