My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00124
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:01:58 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:36:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153394
Contractor Name
Wellington, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
1
County
Larimer
Bill Number
SB 81-439
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />e. Economic Analysis <br /> <br />A SUITlT\3.ry of the engineer IS oplnlon of probable cost for the <br />facilities to be built with CWCB and FHA I1Dney is shawn in Table <br />6. An analysis of the resulting average I1Dpthly rate is shawn in <br />Table 7. The projected average I1Dnthly rate for this alternative <br />is $3.18 higher than the ELCO alternative. HONever, after the <br />term of the service agreement for the treatrrent plant expires, <br />the rate will be reduced by $17.96 per I1Dnth. <br /> <br />To address the concerns of the Board for people on fixed incomes, <br />a preliminary rate analysis was rrade to detennine the miniIruJrn <br />I1Dnth1y charge that would have to be collected to cover the fixed <br />costs. That analysis is shawn in Table 8. A projected cash flON <br />using a rate of $35/I1Dnth miniIruJrn charge and $1. 65 per 1000 <br />gallons is shawn in Table 9 for total armual use by the Tawn of <br />33.96 aJ, 50.0 MJ, 75.0 MJ and 100.0 MJ. <br /> <br />Conclusions ana ReccmTEndations <br /> <br />This infornation was presented to the Town Board on June 15th, June 17th <br />and again on June 22nd. After a considerable arrount of discussion it was <br />felt that the North Poudre Alternative offered the follONing significant <br />advantages over the ELCO Alternative: <br /> <br />1. The town is paying for its awn water system and will not be paying <br />another entity forever for water with no guaranteed capacity. The <br />Town will control its awn destiny. <br /> <br />2. Although the projected rate is slightly higher than the ELCO <br />alternative initially, the rates will be reduced significantly after 8 <br />years when the plant becomes the property of the Town. <br /> <br />3. The plant will provide soft water to the Town. <br /> <br />4. The North Poudre Irrigation Co. has agreed to deliver water to the <br />Town at reasonable tenus and has shawn a willingness to work with the <br />Town by leasing property for a plant and tank for no additional <br />charge. <br /> <br />5. The plant will be guaranteed to be capable of producing water rreeting <br />the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act. <br /> <br />6. The plant will be warranted against defects in construction for 5 to 8 <br />years instead of the nonnal on year. <br /> <br />A proposed schedule to proceed with the project is shawn on Table 10. <br /> <br />Based on this, the Board decided to proceed with the North poudre <br />Alternative and directed TS & T to prepare the necessary infornation for <br />submittal to FHA and CI'lCB. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.