My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00124
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:01:58 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:36:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153394
Contractor Name
Wellington, Town of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
1
County
Larimer
Bill Number
SB 81-439
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />.A <br /> <br />The water in North Poudre Reservoir No. 3 was sarrpled again on <br />July 12th and July 16th for hardness, calcium, rragnesium and <br />alkalinity with the following results: <br /> <br />Hardness (as Ca CO ) <br />Alkalinity (as Ca C03) <br />Calci~ (as Ca C03) <br />Magneslum <br /> <br />7-12-82 <br />305 <br />107 <br />100 <br />38 <br /> <br />7-16-82 <br />310 <br />124 <br />18G <br />32 <br /> <br />The results of the analysis indicate that the water quality in <br />the North Poudre Reservoir No. 3 varies considerably. This is <br />dependent on the anount of water the Irrigation Carpany runs <br />through the reservoir. The water quality of the canal is <br />significantly better than the reservoir and would not require any <br />softening, as evidenced by the test results of the inlet ditch. <br />The =rent water quality of the reservoir is due prinarily to <br />the inflow from the ground water. The water quality should be <br />significantly inl>roved when the I=igation Carpany runs ditch <br />water in the reservoir. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Description of Facilities <br /> <br />The facilities to be constructed with Cw::B and FHA funds include <br />a 1 M3 steel tank located near North Poudre Reservoir No.3, a 16 <br />inch transmission line from the tank to town, the in town <br />inl>rovements proposed in the final report, a raw water intake and <br />punp station near the reservoir and a treated water punp station <br />to punp fran the treat:rrent plant to the tank. The treat:rrent <br />plant and appurtenances will be constructed and financed by a <br />private entity and leased to the Town for a period of eight years <br />at the end of which term the facility will becare the property of <br />the town. The proposed facilities are shown on Exhibit B <br />included with this arrendrrent. A preliminary site plan is shown <br />on Exhibit C. <br /> <br />The treatrrent plant will include the unit processes of flash <br />mixing, flocculation, sedirrentation, dual-rredia gravity filtra- <br />tion and chlorination. A s1.lITlIT\3IY of the proposed design criteria <br />is shown in Table 5. <br /> <br />One significant advantage for using the lease arrangement is the <br />fact that the plant will be guaranteed to produce a water rreeting <br />the prinary Drinking ,vater Standards of the Colorado Department <br />of Health. Another advantage is the fact that the plant will be <br />warranted against defects in construction for a period of 5 to 8 <br />years instead of the notTIBl one year. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.