Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />can likely be produced from the alluvial material. Mr. Schrader's <br />report (included in Appendix C-l) gives a number of suggestions on <br />means of processing to improve the quality and gradation of the <br />aggregate. <br /> <br />C. Supplemental Materials Investigation <br /> <br />Because of the uncertainties of the first aggregate and RCC trial mix <br />test results, it was decided to expand on the investigation of aggre- <br />gates. If the Rock Creek Valley aggregates could not provide adequate <br />strength RCC, alternative sources in either the Colorado River Basin or <br />the Yampa River Basin would have to be utilized. The importation of <br />materials from these long distances would substantially increase the <br />cost of a RCC dam at the Rock Creek site. <br /> <br />During the summer of 1986, additional test pits were excavated in the <br />Rock Creek Valley 1 to 2 miles upstream of the proposed dam axis. Bulk <br />samples of the materials were taken and additional laboratory tests <br />were made to verify the materials' suitability as RCC aggregate. In <br />addition, a RCC trial mix program was carried out on the Rock Creek <br />Valley materials as well as aggregates from a commercial gravel pit <br />near Kremmling. The details of the supplemental materials investiga- <br />tions is presented in Appendix C-2. <br /> <br />The RCC trial mixes indicated lower than normal strengths for RCC with <br />low cement content (100 lbs/cu. yd.). The mixes with fly ash also <br />exhibited very slow strength gain. <br /> <br />It was concluded that the Rock Creek Valley aggregates would provide an <br />adequate supply and could be used to produce an acceptable RCC mix with <br />cement contents in the range of 135 lbs/cu. yd. along with about 65 <br />lbs/cu. yd. of fly ash. The higher cementitious material content than <br />originally estimated results in higher cost estimates but substantially <br />less than the cost if aggregate materials were imported. <br /> <br />3 - 13 <br /> <br />6819W/5020W <br />