My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153629 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153629 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 10:25:18 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:36:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153629
Contractor Name
Colorado River Water Conservation District, The
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
50
County
Grand
Bill Number
SB 87-15
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o Develop appropriate design earthquakes. <br /> <br />o Define hypocentral/epicentral locations, site attenuation <br />characteristics and average peak bedrock horizontal accelera- <br />tions. <br /> <br />o Assess the potential for other seismically-induced hazards at <br />the site. <br /> <br />Michael West and Associates collected historic seismicity data (magni- <br />tude/intensity geographic coordinates, focal depth, date, etc.) for <br />recorded earthquakes within a 200-mile radius of the sites as compiled <br />from computer records of the National Geophysical Data Center. Maximum <br />Credible Earthquakes (MCE) were assigned to each seismogenic source <br />zone likely to affect the sites. Peak horizontal bedrock accelerations <br />attenuated to the sites were estimated using magnitude/distance rela- <br />tionships. <br /> <br />Based on the field work, geologic evaluation, and seismological studies, <br />it was concluded that the Antelope Pass fault is non-seismogenic and <br />need not be considered as a likely earthquake source affecting project <br />design. Segments of the Gore Fault, Gore Pass Fault and Monument Creek <br />Fault and other faults nearer to the Rock Creek area also show no con- <br />clusive evidence of seismogenic movement. However, lineaments and geo- <br />morphic features apparently associated with the Gore Fault, located one <br />mile west of the Rock Creek Dam sites, are suggestive of seismogenic <br />movement. These features, however, may also be explained by non- <br />tectonic mechanisms and data collected in this study are insufficient <br />to characterize these surface features as seismogenic. <br /> <br />A conservative assessment of the potential earthquake magnitude possi- <br />ble at the two damsites was made by selecting a hypothetical "floating" <br />earthquake of Richter magnitude 5.5 occurring within 10 km from each <br />site. This would result in peak horizontal bedrock accelerations rang- <br />ing from 0.20 g to 0.34 g. Hypothetical Maximum Credible Earthquakes <br /> <br />2 - 2 <br /> <br />7042W/5020W <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.