Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />(' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />PLAN OF STUDY <br />UTE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT.. <br />PLATEAU CREEK PIPELINE <br />FEASIBILITY STUDY <br /> <br />The Ute Water Conservancy District (District) applied to the Colorado Water <br /> <br /> <br />Conservation Board (CWCB) to participate in the funding of a preliminary <br /> <br /> <br />engineering evaluation of their raw water pipeline. The request was approved at <br /> <br /> <br />the September 4, 1986, meeting of the CWCB. <br /> <br />Currently, the District obtains raw water from Plateau Creek at the tail <br /> <br /> <br />race of the Molina Power Plant. The water is conveyed by gravity flow through <br /> <br /> <br />an eighteen mile long, 24-inch reinforced concrete pipeline that follows the <br /> <br /> <br />creek down Plateau Canyon. The pipeline enters the Colorado River Canyon via a <br /> <br /> <br />2500 foot tunnel. During the flood years of 1982 and 1983, the pipeline was <br /> <br /> <br />severed on several occasions. The District was forced to utilized an emergency <br /> <br /> <br />pump station on the Colorado River to continue the supply of domestic water to <br /> <br /> <br />its users. The pump station was constructed during the drought of 1977 and was <br /> <br /> <br />intended to function during extremely low flow. Problems with silt and debris <br /> <br /> <br />were experienced with the pumps when they were used during high flow. Access to <br /> <br /> <br />the broken pipeline was limited due to the flooding, increasing the cost of <br /> <br />repair. The District has spent over $1.5 million repairing the flood damage to <br /> <br /> <br />the raw water line. Also, the District has recently completed an expansion of <br /> <br /> <br />its treatment facilities. The capacity of the plant was increased from 10 MGD <br /> <br /> <br />to 22 MGD. Concern exist regarding the reliability of the twenty-two year old <br /> <br /> <br />existing supply pipeline and its ability to delivery sufficient water for the <br /> <br />future needs of the District. <br /> <br />The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safe yield of water rights the <br /> <br /> <br />District holds and to consider means of delivering an adequate supply of water <br /> <br /> <br />to its treatment plant. The study will evaluate, at a feasibility level of <br /> <br /> <br />detail, alternatives to the present pipeline system as well as replacement of <br /> <br />the existing pipeline. The evaluation will consider the results of the safe <br /> <br />yield study and future needs of the District, based on a twenty year planning <br /> <br />