Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II to take into consideration capacity constraints of the CBT and Vindy Gap <br />systems and to more closely simulate the operating policies of the NCVCD <br />with respect to these projects. The revised computer models were utilized <br />to simulate the monthly operations of the City's water supply sources under <br />the Design Conditions. The principal modifications included: <br /> <br />o Allowance for carry-over of CBT water in accordance with NCVCD <br />policies. <br /> <br />o Operation of the CBT-Vindy Gap Projects to maXImIze Vindy Gap <br />deliveries in accordance with the recent policy statement by the <br />NCYCD. <br /> <br />o Consideration of capacity constraints in the conveyance facilities <br />utilized by Loveland - i.e., Dille Tunnel and Charles Hansen Feeder <br />Canal (CHFC). <br /> <br />o CBT shareholders were not allowed to divert more than 50 percent of <br />their entitlement during the winter. <br /> <br />The net result of these modifications was that the magnitude of the water <br /> <br /> <br />supply deficit at the lOO-year recurrence interval in Phase II (2,745 <br /> <br />acre-feet) was less than that estimated in Phase I (4,850 acre-feet). In <br /> <br /> <br />contrast, the Phase II results indicated that a deficit of some magnitude <br /> <br /> <br />occurred, on average, every 3.2 years while the previous Phase I study <br /> <br /> <br />indicated that a deficit could be expected every 6.2 years. Thus, future <br /> <br /> <br />deficits are predicted to be less severe in magnitude but more frequent in <br /> <br /> <br />occurrence than originally estimated in Phase I. <br /> <br />Evaluation of Plan Elements - Twelve unique, specific actions (i.e., Plan <br />Elements) that the City may take to reduce or eliminate projected water <br />supply deficits were evaluated. The evaluations were performed using <br />the computer models as modified in the Phase II study to simulate the <br />monthly operation of the City's raw water supply system. <br /> <br />Each Plan Element was first evaluated based on its ability to reduce or <br /> <br /> <br />eliminate the lOO-year deficit under the Design Conditions and on its cost <br /> <br /> <br />of implementation. The results of these evaluations are summarized in <br /> <br />-5- <br />