My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00106
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:06 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153494
Contractor Name
Loveland, City of
Water District
0
County
Larimer
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o A leakage reduction program be conducted City-wide, resulting in a 1 <br />to 2 percent reduction in all water usage. <br /> <br />The following Emergency Strategies were also selected: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o \later use. restrictions in conjunction with a public education <br />program could be implemented in April through October during drought <br />periods, resulting in a 2.5 to 5 percent reduction in water used for <br />lawn watering. <br /> <br />strategies to simulate <br />minimal combination of <br /> <br />the effect <br /> <br />were developed utilizing the above <br />on the Design Condition deficit. The <br /> <br />Three water conservation scenarios <br /> <br />strategies used the low values in the demand <br /> <br />reduction ranges. The moderate combination of strategies used the low <br /> <br /> <br />values for the Long-Term Strategies and the high values for the Emergency <br /> <br /> <br />Strategies. The aggressive combination of strategies used the high values <br /> <br />in the reduction ranges. The predicted net reductions in annual demand for <br /> <br /> <br />the three scenarios are: <br /> <br />o Minimal (Scenario 1) - 2.9 percent (3.9 percent during drought) <br /> <br />o Moderate (Scenario 2) - 2.9 percent (4.9 percent during drought) <br /> <br />o Aggressive (Scenario 3) - 5.2 percent (7.1 percent during drought) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Comparisons of the Design Condition monthly water demands to the reduced <br /> <br /> <br />demands are presented graphically in Figures 4-1 and 4-2. Figure 4-1 shows <br /> <br /> <br />the demands resulting from implementation of Long-Term Strategies. Figure <br /> <br /> <br />4-2 shows the demands resulting from the additional implementation of <br /> <br /> <br />Emergency Strategies during drought periods. Figure 4-3 shows the demand <br /> <br /> <br />reductions, in terms of in-house and outdoor use, attainable under drought <br /> <br /> <br />conditions (Emergency Strategies in effect). <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Depending on the strategies employed, a deficit reduction of 614 to 1,178 <br />AF (from the Design Condition deficit of 2,745 AF) would be possible. <br /> <br />4-13 <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.