Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o A leakage reduction program be conducted City-wide, resulting in a 1 <br />to 2 percent reduction in all water usage. <br /> <br />The following Emergency Strategies were also selected: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o \later use. restrictions in conjunction with a public education <br />program could be implemented in April through October during drought <br />periods, resulting in a 2.5 to 5 percent reduction in water used for <br />lawn watering. <br /> <br />strategies to simulate <br />minimal combination of <br /> <br />the effect <br /> <br />were developed utilizing the above <br />on the Design Condition deficit. The <br /> <br />Three water conservation scenarios <br /> <br />strategies used the low values in the demand <br /> <br />reduction ranges. The moderate combination of strategies used the low <br /> <br /> <br />values for the Long-Term Strategies and the high values for the Emergency <br /> <br /> <br />Strategies. The aggressive combination of strategies used the high values <br /> <br />in the reduction ranges. The predicted net reductions in annual demand for <br /> <br /> <br />the three scenarios are: <br /> <br />o Minimal (Scenario 1) - 2.9 percent (3.9 percent during drought) <br /> <br />o Moderate (Scenario 2) - 2.9 percent (4.9 percent during drought) <br /> <br />o Aggressive (Scenario 3) - 5.2 percent (7.1 percent during drought) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Comparisons of the Design Condition monthly water demands to the reduced <br /> <br /> <br />demands are presented graphically in Figures 4-1 and 4-2. Figure 4-1 shows <br /> <br /> <br />the demands resulting from implementation of Long-Term Strategies. Figure <br /> <br /> <br />4-2 shows the demands resulting from the additional implementation of <br /> <br /> <br />Emergency Strategies during drought periods. Figure 4-3 shows the demand <br /> <br /> <br />reductions, in terms of in-house and outdoor use, attainable under drought <br /> <br /> <br />conditions (Emergency Strategies in effect). <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Depending on the strategies employed, a deficit reduction of 614 to 1,178 <br />AF (from the Design Condition deficit of 2,745 AF) would be possible. <br /> <br />4-13 <br /> <br />I <br />