My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00106
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:06 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:35:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153494
Contractor Name
Loveland, City of
Water District
0
County
Larimer
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.2.3 CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS <br /> <br />The transmission capacity of the Dille Tunnel is approximately 400 cfs. <br /> <br /> <br />Historic flows from water years 1979 through 1985 were evaluated to assess <br /> <br /> <br />the available capacity. Those records showed that flow in the tunnel <br /> <br />during the irrigation season (i.e., April through October) averaged only 47 <br /> <br /> <br />cfs and exceeded 300 cfs only four percent of the time. It was concluded <br /> <br /> <br />that the flow characteristics of the tunnel itself present an <br /> <br /> <br />insignificant, if any, constraint on use of that facility. <br /> <br />Capacity-constraint curves for each month were also prepared from similar <br />data for the CHFC. The observed historical flows, however, were increased <br />by the estimated quantity of Vindy Gap water that would be transported in <br />the CHFC prior to calculation of the flow duration characteristics. This <br />was necessary because the historic data base did not include delivery of <br />Vindy Gap water. The increased flows due to transport of this water were <br />estimated from the projected ownership and usage of Vindy Gap given in the <br />Vindy Gap EIS (VPRS, 1981). <br /> <br />Figures 3-2 through 3-5 illustrate the capacity constraint curves for the <br />months of June through September, respectively, developed for the CHFC. <br />These curves depict the percentage of time that the available capacity in <br />the canal is predicted to be less than or equal to a specified flow rate. <br />Separate curves are shown for the canal to the south of (before) and to the <br />north of (after) the siphon. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The curves demonstrate that no capacity will be available to Loveland in <br />the CHFC the following percentages of time: <br /> Before After <br /> Month Siphon Siphon <br /> June 1.8% 5.4% <br /> July 9.4% 16.1% <br /> August 0.0% 3.8% <br /> September 0.0% 0.15% <br /> <br />3-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.