My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153642 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153642 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:05 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:34:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153642
Contractor Name
Colorado River Water Conservation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
425
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />General Approach................................................................................... 4-26 <br />Single-Discipline Evaluations..................................................,.................. 4-27 <br />Multi-Disciplinary Evaluation.................................................................... 4-27 <br />Site Selection Recommendations ..... ............. ......................... ...................... 4-29 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 5 . Development of Basin Model <br /> <br />Modeling Objectives and Approach ...................................................................... 5-1 <br />Review of Previous Basin Modeling .............................................................:....... 5-1 <br />The HYDROSS Model...................,.......................................................... 5-1 <br />Hydrology and Demands Represented in the HYDROSS Model......,.................... 5-2 <br />Review of HYDROSS Modeling Assumptions................................................. 5-2 <br />Comparison of HYDROSS and Feasibility Study Depletion Assumptions ............... 5-3 <br />Development of Basin Model.............................................................................. 54 <br />Introduction to Network Modeling ............................................................... 5-5 <br />Model Configuration ....... ........... ......... ............... ......... .............. ............... 5-5 <br />Representation of Hydrology in the Basin Model............................................. 5-10 <br />Representation of Demands and Reservoirs.. ..... .................. ..... ................. ..... 5-15 <br /> <br />Reservoir Operations..,............................................................................ 5-24 <br />Model Validation... ....,.... ........,..... ....... .......... .... .... .............. ...... .............5-26 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 6 - Evaluation of Alternatives <br /> <br />Overview ...................................................................................................... 6-1 <br />Evaluation Criteria......... ......... .... ....... ...:....... ..'............ ..... ..,.................,.. 6-1 <br />Use of the Basin Model........ ........... ...... .......... ........... .... ......... '" ...............6-1 <br />Definition of Alternatives .......................................................................... 6-2 <br />Scenario I - No Action (Baseline)......................................................................... 6-3 <br />Key Assumptions of Scenario ..................................................................... 6-3 <br />Results of Scenario I ............... ........................ .................. ........... ............ 6-6 <br />Scenario II - Conversion of Juniper Rights Only...................................................... 6-8 <br />Key Assumptions of Scenario ..................................................................... 6-8 <br />Results of Scenario II ...... ............................. ............ ....... ........................6-11 <br />Scenario 1II - Enlargement ofElkhead Reservoir.....................................................6-14 <br />Key Assumptions of Scenario .' ............ ............ ....... .... ............ ........... .... ....6-14 <br />Results of Scenario III ............ ....................... .................................. ........ 6-16 <br />Scenario IV - Enlargement of Elkhead and Stagecoach <br /> <br />Reservoirs.................................................................................... 6-20 <br />Key Assumptions of the Scenario........ .............. ........ .......................... ........ 6-20 <br />Results of Scenario IV .............................................................................6-20 <br />Scenario V - Elkhead Enlargement with <br /> <br />Williams Fork Project. ........... ..... ...... ......... ............. ......... .......... ...... 6-22 <br />Key Assumptions of Scenario ...... .... ............... ..... ....................,... ..............6-22 <br />Results of Scenario V .. .............. ..................... .......... ....................... ........ 6-25 <br />Environmental Considerations .......... ........ ........................ ............... ........... ........6-29 <br /> <br />Sport Fisheries..................................,.......................,............................ 6-29 <br />Flow Conditions in Occupied Habitat........................................................... 6-35 <br />Wetlands and Wildlife Impacts... .......................... ............. ....... .................. 6-37 <br />Project development Cost........... ...... .......................... .............. ................. ....... 6-38 <br /> <br />General......................,................,.........................................,.............. 6-38 <br /> <br /> <br />iii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.