Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> TABLE I <br /> SUMMARY OF FIELD PERMEABILITY TESTS <br /> Estimated Calculated <br /> Type of Interval Total Assumed Inflow Permeability Comments & <br />Hole No. Test Tested Head (Ft.) (GPM) (Ft/Yr) Description <br />B-3 Packer 6-21 25.46 9.7 1740 Avg=1920 Ft/yr <br /> 19.53 9.0 2100 Mat'l: 30% concrete- <br /> 70% Bedrock (Granite <br /> Gneiss) <br />B-4 Packer 19-30 47.71 12.8 1220 Avg=1300 Ft/yr <br /> 38.73 11.7 1380 Mat'l: 50% Concrete <br /> 50% Bedrock (Granite <br /> Gneiss) <br />8-4 Packer 14-25 35.89 16.0 2030 Avg=2330 Ft/yr <br /> 28.91 14.5 2280 Matll: 15% Concrete- <br /> 21. 31 12.5 2670 85% Bedrock (Granite <br /> Gneiss) <br />B-4 Packer 9-20 33.16 13.4 1840 Avg=2040 Ft/yr <br /> 32.37 11.5 2240 Matll: Concrete <br />8-4 Packer 2-13 16.45 10.9 3020 Avg=3690 Ft/yr <br /> 10.26 9.8 4350 Matll: Concrete <br /> <br />R-4 <br /> <br />Falling head test was attempted but testing was precluded since the <br />take of the hole exceeded the capacity of the available pump (50 GPM). <br />No fluid loss was ohserved from either face of the dam. <br /> <br />B-2 <br /> <br />Packer testing was precluded hecause of caving. A falling head test <br />was attempted but was precluded due to leakage through the faces of <br />the dam which exceeded the capacity of the available pump (50 GPM). <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br />~ <br />