Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The results of the analysis indicate that Alternative No. 5 is the most beneficial project to <br />pursue. This alternative ranked highest among the six alternatives evaluated because it <br />provides a relatively large benefit for the cost. <br /> <br />After extensive analysis, a multitude of presentations to the public, and several revisions <br />of the design elements, Alternative No.5 was selected as the preferred solution. Primary <br />reasons for selection of this alternative included: <br /> <br />. Partial protection of Town of Atwood <br />. Best use of existing Pawnee Creek Channel <br />. Best level of protection for Sterling <br />. Partial protection of farmlands bordering HWY 6 <br /> <br />In general, it makes the most sense to construct drainage improvements from downstream <br />to upstream. The selected Pawnee Creek project is no exception because upstream <br />improvements will increase flows in the lower reaches. If improvements have not been <br />completed in the lower reaches to properly convey the increased discharges, then <br />flooding conditions can be made worse. Therefore, it is recommended that the Pawnee <br />Creek project be constructed starting downstream. If funds are not available to complete <br />the entire project at one time, then the project can separated into the following phases and <br />constructed in the following order: <br /> <br />1. Riverside Cemetery Construction <br />2. Channel and Levees downstream of UPRR <br />3. Pawnee Creek mainstem bridges for HWY 6 <br />4. Box culverts under UPRR embankment at Town of Atwood <br />5. Channel cleaning and debris removal upstream of HWY 6 mainstem <br />bridges <br /> <br />IX. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />Project Location <br /> <br />This study includes the reach along Pawnee Creek from its confluence with the South <br />Platte River IOO-year floodplain upstream to CR. 29, a distance of about 7.5 miles. Areas <br />of concern include locations where potential floodwaters exceed the existing Pawnee <br />Creek channel capacity and damaged farmlands, CRs, and houses. Also of concern is the <br />Pawnee Creek Overflow where floodwater overtops the channel to the north and <br />eventually inundates portions of the City of Sterling. In addition to the Pawnee Creek <br />Overflow, there are areas adjacent to and upstream of CR. 31 where flows overtop the <br />channel to the south and eventually flow into the Town of Town of Atwood. <br />Improvements for confining split flow areas to the south were not evaluated for this <br />study. <br /> <br />31 <br />