Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />expanded by adding 4 cells of20' wide X 8' tall RCBs to the south of the existing bridge. The existing <br />timber bridge along the northbound lanes would be replaced. The CDOT currently has plans to replace <br />the timber bridge within the next 3 to 5 years. In the summer of 1996, the UPRRJBNRR replaced their <br />bridge located just downstream of HWY 6 for structural reasons. Design of the new railroad bridge <br />was such that the new bridge will ultimately convey the 100-year peak discharge. Since the proposed <br />bridge improvements would allow more flow downstream of HWY 6, a second system of levees and a <br />floodwall are proposed to confine storm water downstream of the highway to the 100-year floodplain <br />of the South Platte River. The estimated project cost of the proposed improvements along Pawnee <br />Creek is $1,135,500. This cost does not include the new bridge at HWY 6 by CDOT or the newly <br />constructed railroad crossing by UPRR. <br /> <br />These proposed improvements would eliminate the Pawnee Creek overflows from draining into the <br />City. The overflows are estimated to be about 5,000 cfs during the lOO-year storm. Eliminating these <br />overflows removes a substantial amount of land and many structures from the floodplain in both Logan <br />County and the City of Sterling. <br /> <br />Alternative No.3. This alternative is a series of upstream flood control reservoirs as presented in the <br />report entitled "Flood Plain Management Study, Pawnee Creek and Logan Creek, Colorado" dated <br />April 1992. This alternative will store floodwaters in detention structures in the upper watershed. <br />. General location of the reservoirs is shown on Figure 10. <br /> <br />Alternative No.4: This alternative will collect the Pawnee Creek overflow and divert these flows <br />directly to the South Platte River in the general vicinity of the Cemetery just south of Sterling. This <br />alternative consists of construction of a berm having an approximate height of 5 feet to the north and <br />west of the Riverside Cemetery. This berm would collect and prevent flows from the Pawnee <br />overflow from entering the City along the HWY 6!Railroad embankments. Included in the alternative <br />is lowering of CR. 24, construction of a channel with a concrete floodwall, a closure structure for <br />HWY 6, construction of box culverts under the railroad, a siphon for the Sterling No.1 Ditch, and <br />construction of a trapezoidal channel to the South Platte River. This alternative is shown on Figure 11. <br /> <br />Alternative No.5: The proposed alternative will provide a conveyance structure at Town of Atwood, <br />increasing the bridge capacities at the mainstem of Pawnee Creek, channel cleaning, (debris removal) <br />and stabilization measures upstream ofHWY 6 to CR 29, and the project features of Alternative No.4. <br />This alternative consists of construction of Alternative No.4, along with modifications and new HWY <br />6 bridges, channel and levee improvements downstream of the UPRR at Town of Atwood. Flows in <br />excess of the design event on the mainstem would thus necessitate providing the project features at the <br />Riverside Cemetery. Alternative No.5 would decrease the severity o( the 100-year flood event in the <br />area west of HWY 6 between the Pawnee Creek Bridge and the Cemetery, but would not eliminate all <br />overflows. In addition, this alternative would provide flood benefits to the community of Atwood. <br />This alternative is shown on Figure 12. <br /> <br />Alternative No.6: This alternative provides a drainage floodway upstream of the Town of Atwood <br />that diverts Pawnee Creek to the south, along CR. 29 directly to the South Platte River. The floodway <br />would be sized for the 100-year storm peak flow and would handle a discharge equal to the July 1997 <br />flood event at that location. This alternative would require crossings for the Pawnee Irrigation Ditch, <br />and both HWY 6 and the UPRR. This alternative is shown on Figure 13. <br /> <br />16 <br />