Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />June 18, 1975 <br /> <br />Mr. Morton W. Bittinger <br />M. W. Bittinger and Associates, Inc. <br />P. O. Box Q <br />Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Bittinger: <br /> <br />Thank you very much for the preliminary report for "Morgan <br />County Quality Water District Water Supply and Distribution System <br />Feasibility Study." <br /> <br />We have reviewed it and we have the following . comments to <br /> <br />make: <br /> <br />1. A project summary, i.e., a brief resume of the contents <br />of the feasibility report is not included in the report as required <br />by If, "Prefacing material - Project Summary" of Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB) Guidelines. <br /> <br />2. Project map. It would be preferable to show the proposed <br />project features such as pipelines, etc., in colors. Then they would <br />be easier to read and one would not "get lost" in a lot of unnecessary <br />detail of the same intensity as the salient details. This is in <br />accordance with 2a of CWCB Guidelines. Locations of valves should <br />also be shown. <br /> <br />3. Financial status. More details establishing the 24 <br />million dollars assessed valuation would be helpful. <br /> <br />4. Page 5, second paragraph, first line, eighth word should <br />be "proposed". <br /> <br />5. On page 5 of the report more details should be given of <br />the present water requirements. Conclusions should also be drawn. The <br />figure of 20,000 gal/mo/tap a ppears a little vague. Please elaborate <br />because in the table this figure appears low. . <br />