Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />PROJECT SUMMARY <br /> <br />The City of Louisville currently relies on Louisville Reservoir for its <br />winter water supply. The capacity of Louisville Reservoir is 171 acre-feet <br />although it holds a storage decree for 290 acre-feet. The useable capacity of <br />Louisville Reservoir is approximately 130 acre-feet. Therefore, during winter <br />operation, the total winter supply available to the City of Louisville is a <br />maximum of 420 acre-feet which includes 130 acre-feet of carryover storage <br />in Louisville Reservoir plus the 290 acre-feet storage decree. By the winter <br />of 1984-1985, demands by the City of Louisville will have exceeded its winter <br />water supply. <br />In response to the demand for storage, the City inititated studies on <br />four potential reservoir sites which included: (1) expansion of Louisville <br />Reservoir; (2) expansion of Harper Lake; (3) construction of an on-stream reservoir <br />on South Boulder Creek near Eldora Springs, Colorado, and (4) construction of <br />a storage facility at the gravel pit site located west of 80th Street, adjacent <br />to Harper Lake. This report evaluates seven alternate reservoir configurations <br />at the four sites including one alternate for the Louisville Reservoir expansion, <br />one alternate for the gravel pit, four alternates for the Harper Lake site and <br />one alternate for the Eldorado Springs site. A summary of the seven alternatives <br />is shown on the attached table on page ix. <br />Harper Lake Alternate II is recommended as the most feasible alternative <br />of the various sites examined. The recommended Harper Lake Reservoir would <br />provide a total storage capacity of 715 acre-feet with a usable capacity of 615 <br />acre-feet, assuming maintenance of a 100 acre-foot recreational pool. Features <br />of the project would include: (1) construction of a zoned earthfilled embank- <br />ment ranging in height from less than one foot to a maximum of 14 feet with a <br />total embankment volume of 164,000 cubic yards, (2) excavation of 941,000 cubic <br /> <br />viii <br />