Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Apart from the 1 imitations on capacity, the physical conditions of the raw <br />water supply facilities varies widely. A general description of the condition <br />of major system components is as follows: <br /> <br />Reservoirs. For purposes of this report, only the lower level reservoirs will <br />be addressed, namely, Juniata. Purdy Mesa and Reeder. In 1985, an inspection <br />of the Reeder, Purdy Mesa and Juniata dams was made by a representative of the <br />State Engineer's Office. The investigation found both Purdy Mesa and Juniata <br />to be "conditionally satisfactory and the state of maintenance good". At <br />Juniata dam. which has a Class I hazard classification. the State's main <br />concern is erosion on the downstream slope. At Purdy Mesa. a Class II hazard <br />classification, their concern is that the spillway needs rehabilitation. The <br />City is currently taking steps to resolve these issues. <br /> <br />Reeder Reservoi r is under an ei ght foot fill i ng restri ct i on imposed by the <br />State Engineer's Office. due to the presence of seepage on the downstream face <br />of the dam. Access and inspection is made difficult by heavy vegetation in the <br />embankment area. See Chapter 4 for further discussion of the status and <br />potential of Reeder Reservoir. <br /> <br />Flow Lines. In 1972 HDR performed an evaluation of the Kannah Creek and Purdy <br />Mesa flow 1 ines. The major areas of deficiency were del ineated. with the <br />primary concerns being badly corroded steel pipe and entrapped air. The net <br />effect is a gradual decrease in capacity. both voluntary (to protect corrosion- <br />weakened pipe from blowout). and involuntary (due to air entrapment). Specific <br />recommendations were made to extend the pipeline serviceability. some of which <br />have been implemented. An updated evaluation is being considered by City staff <br />at this time to determine the maximum service life of the flow lines. <br /> <br />2-7 <br />