My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00020
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2010 12:54:54 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153567
Contractor Name
Grand Junction, City of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
72
County
Mesa
Bill Number
SB 89-85
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1. Facilities for diverting up to 30 cfs of raw water from the North Fork of <br />Kannah Creek to Juniata Reservoir. <br /> <br />2. Enlargement of Reeder Reservoir, establishing relative costs for various <br />storage volumes up to approximately 700 acre-feet. <br /> <br />3. Prov i ding an interconnect i on permit t i ng Reeder Reservo i r to discharge to <br />the proposed new Kannah Creek Flow Line. This component, in conjunction <br />with number 2 above would allow additional storage of raw water for <br />municipal use. <br /> <br />2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS <br /> <br />The existing capacities of the various principal components of the City water <br />supply system as defined by the City Water Department are summarized in Table <br />2-2. Contrasted with these in Table 2-3 are the annual water demands according <br />to City records for the twelve year period from 1973 - 1984. An evaluation of <br />the adequacy of these system capacities is not within the scope of this report. <br />However, to provide some means of determining the relevancy of the data, it can <br />be said that the raw water flow line and the water treatment plant should be <br />capable of delivering the maximum day demand, which is typically estimated at <br />approximately 3.0 times the average day demand for cities comparable to Grand <br />Junction. Thus, for 1984 (maximum day demand=15.6 MGD) it is apparent that <br />treatment capacity was adequate while flow line capacity was exceeded, <br />necessitating a draw on plant raw water storage. In the drought year of 1976, <br />however, the maximum day demand was in excess of 20 MGD, thus depleting <br />finished water storage as well as plant raw water storage. In fact, the <br />average maximum day demand for the twelve year period, 18 MGD, is indicative of <br /> <br />2-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.