Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1. Facilities for diverting up to 30 cfs of raw water from the North Fork of <br />Kannah Creek to Juniata Reservoir. <br /> <br />2. Enlargement of Reeder Reservoir, establishing relative costs for various <br />storage volumes up to approximately 700 acre-feet. <br /> <br />3. Prov i ding an interconnect i on permit t i ng Reeder Reservo i r to discharge to <br />the proposed new Kannah Creek Flow Line. This component, in conjunction <br />with number 2 above would allow additional storage of raw water for <br />municipal use. <br /> <br />2.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS <br /> <br />The existing capacities of the various principal components of the City water <br />supply system as defined by the City Water Department are summarized in Table <br />2-2. Contrasted with these in Table 2-3 are the annual water demands according <br />to City records for the twelve year period from 1973 - 1984. An evaluation of <br />the adequacy of these system capacities is not within the scope of this report. <br />However, to provide some means of determining the relevancy of the data, it can <br />be said that the raw water flow line and the water treatment plant should be <br />capable of delivering the maximum day demand, which is typically estimated at <br />approximately 3.0 times the average day demand for cities comparable to Grand <br />Junction. Thus, for 1984 (maximum day demand=15.6 MGD) it is apparent that <br />treatment capacity was adequate while flow line capacity was exceeded, <br />necessitating a draw on plant raw water storage. In the drought year of 1976, <br />however, the maximum day demand was in excess of 20 MGD, thus depleting <br />finished water storage as well as plant raw water storage. In fact, the <br />average maximum day demand for the twelve year period, 18 MGD, is indicative of <br /> <br />2-5 <br />