Laserfiche WebLink
<br />14 <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />added to the Rocky Mountain National Park. With permission of Congress, <br />the Company built three additional miles of ditch at the reputed cost of <br />less than $500 for machine labor, as against the reputed $375,000 it had <br />paid for hand labor on the first 11 miles. The Company also dammed Long <br />Draw to create a reservoir. <br /> <br />"Today most of the Grand Ditch is clearly seen from the Trail Ridge Road or <br />from the floor of Kawuneeche Valley. The l4-mile ditch starts in Bakers <br />Gulch and runs north to La Poudre Pass at an exact slant designed to keep <br />the channel reasonably clean but not to wash out the banks. On the eastern <br />side of the Pass the water flows into Long Draw Reservoir where it rests <br />until late summer when the farmers around Fort ColI ins need it for the <br />last irrigation of their sugar beets. Ditches like the Grand Ditch have <br />turned what Major Long called the Great American Desert into the Sugar <br />Bowl of America,," <br /> <br />FINANCIAL STATEMENTS <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Financial Statements and Schedules included in the appl ication report <br />(Tables 11-6 through II-K) are copies of statements and schedules included <br />in the November 30, 1966, and the November 30, 1967, Auditor's Reports pre- <br />pared by Rogers and McClusky, Certified Publ ic Accountants, Fort Collins, <br />Colorado. The auditors have certified that the statements represent fairly <br />the financial condition of the Company. <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />Mr. W" J. McAnelley, a civil and water engineer of Fort Coil ins and Water <br />Commissioner for District No.3 of Colorado, was employed in the year 1940 by <br />the Water Supply and Storage Company to make a reappraisal of all properties <br />of the Company. Th is was done for two reasons: (I) many of the va I ues as <br />carried on the books were admittedly out of proportion to the facts, and <br />(2) many of the water rights which were bought in the early history of the <br />Company had increased in value far out of proportion to the original cost. <br />The amount of $1,347,515.08 now shown on the books of the Water Supply and <br />Storage Company (Tables II-B and II-G) as surplus from reappraisal, is the <br />net increase in the valuation of the assets as shown by Mr. McAnelley's <br />report to the Company. In those cases where the original cost of construc- <br />tion was fairly represented by the book figures, the book valuations were <br />retained; in all other cases, Mr. McAnelley's figures based upon the value <br />of water developed over a period of years were used. <br />