Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Seepage. The seepage analyses were utilized to determine the need for internal drainage, the <br />location of the required control, and the capacity required. The location of the phreatic surface <br />from the seepage studies were used in the stability analyses. Varying the location of the drains <br />and thus the phreatic level in the darn was found to be a major consideration as to overall stability, <br /> <br />The analysis of the existing embankment predicted the phreatic line would exist the dam face at <br />a location approximately 15 feet above the darn toe as shown on Figure 5. If this is the case, the <br />darn would not be expected to be stable under long term steady state seepage conditions. The fact, <br />that the reservoir was normally not full for long periods, most likely is the reason it did function <br />acceptably for 50 years prior to the failure. . <br /> <br />Due to the high phreatic surface predicted in the dam, a drainage blanket and toe drain are <br />considered essential to the long term stability of the darn when it is rebuilt, A dam lower in height <br />may only need a toe drain, but further analysis will have to be conducted to determine this. <br /> <br />Figure 6 through Figure 8 show the results of the seepage analyses and the location of the phreatic <br />surface for each alternative. The location of the phreatic surface for Alternative 2 with only a toe <br />drain is marginal, as can be seen, and if this alternative were chosen additional studies would have <br />to be conducted. <br /> <br />Figure 7 and Figure 8 for alternatives 3 and 4 indicate a drainage blanket in conjunction with a <br />toe drain will effectively handle the seepage and lower the phreatic surface within the darn to <br />acceptable levels. <br /> <br />Slope Stability. The slope stability analyses were conducted utilizing effective stress shear <br />strength parameters that were assumed as shown in Table 3. FinaI design strengths will be based <br />on drained triaxial shear tests and drained direct shear tests. <br /> <br />The results of the analyses for the long term steady state conditions are shown in the Table 3 and <br />on Figures 9 through 12. The embankment slopes, for the alternatives evaluated, are believed to <br />be stable with factors of safety near that required by the State Engineer. Minor changes in the <br />dam configuration and final shear strength data would be expected to produce adequate factors of <br />safety against sliding, The shear strengths used in the analysis are assumed for the dam <br />embankment and darn foundation and we would expect somewhat higher values, especially in the <br />glaciated foundation clays, based on testing of the insitu materials. <br /> <br />The long term seepage condition is the critical case and is presented in Table 3. Sudden <br />drawdown and steady state seepage with earthquake were also analyzed but were not the <br />controlling conditions and are not presented herein. <br /> <br />Carl Smith Dam Feasibility <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />