Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />of Cripple Creek and the Cripple Creek/Victor Mining Company. These recommendations are <br />discussed in detail below, <br /> <br />Instream Flow Recommendation(s) <br /> <br />1 BLM's instream flow recommendation is for 6,0 cfs (April 1 - October 31) & 2.5 cfs <br />(November 1 - May 31) (see BLM letter in Appendix A). <br />2 WWW & QR's instream flow recommendation is for 4,25 cfs (May 1 - July 31) & 3,0 <br />cfs (August 1 - May 31) (see WWW/QRExecutive Summary in Appendix A). <br /> <br />Land Status Review <br /> <br /> Total Length Land Ownership <br />Upper Terminus Lower Terminus (miles) % Private % Public <br />Barnard Creek High Creek 7,3 40 60 <br /> <br />This segment is approximately 60% public land and 40 % private land, 100% of the public land <br />is managed by the BLM (See Figure 1), <br /> <br />Biological Data <br /> <br />The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) and BLM have conducted field surveys of the <br />fishery resources on this stream and have found a natural environment that can be preserved. In <br />this reach of stream, a coldwater fish species was sampled (brook & brown trout) to indicate the <br />existence of a natural environment (See CDOW Reports: Fremont and Teller County Aquatic <br />Community Monitoring 1994 & 1995 and 319 Assessment in Appendix B), <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />WWW, BLM, CDOW and CWCB staff used the R2CROSS methodology to quantify the amount <br />of water required to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2CROSS <br />method requires that stream discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream <br />habitat type. Riffles are most easily visualized, as the stream habitat type that would dry up first <br />should the streamflow cease. This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a <br />transect, surveying the stream channel geometry and measuring the stream discharge, Appendix <br />B contains copies of the field data collected in regards to this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendations <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret the <br />output from the R2CROSS data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow reCommendations. The CDOW has determined that by maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat-types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, five data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />The five surveys are listed in the order of where they are located on the segment, starting from <br />the most upstream survey to the most downstream survey, Table 1 shows who collected the data <br />(Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the measured discharge at the time of the survey <br />(Q). the accuracy range of predicted flows based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), <br />