My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dry Creek Apendices
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
Dry Creek Apendices
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 10:43:23 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 10:49:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
05CW0150
Stream Name
Dry Creek
Water Division
4
Water District
41
County
Montrose
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BLM "" Bureau of Land Management DOW == Division of Wildlife <br />(I) Predicted flow outside ofthe accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendation, which meets 3 of 3 criteria and is within the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model is 7.3 cfs (See Table I). This recommendation was derived by <br />averaging the results of the two data sets. The winter flow recommendation, which meets 2 of 3 <br />criteria and is within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS model is 5.3 cfs (See Table I). It is <br />our belief that recommendations that fall outside of the accuracy range of the model, over 250% <br />of the measured discharge or under 40% of the measured discharge may not give an accurate <br />estimate of the necessary instream flow required. <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br /> <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB and BLM staff, <br />conducted an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available <br />for an instream flow appropriation. Although there is a substantial amount of streamflow gage <br />data available for the Uncompahgre Plateau and Glade Park, most of this data is severely <br />impacted by diversions and irrigation use. This situation makes it difficult to estimate the natural <br />flow regime for the watersheds on the Plateau. Without specific gage data to evaluate, the next <br />best approach is a regional equation that estimates annual flow characteristics. The USGS has <br />developed regional equations (Estimation of Natural Streamflow Characteristics in Western <br />Colorado. Water Resources Investigations Reoort 85-4086. 1985) that apply to the Uncompahgre <br />Plateau and Glade Park based on basin drainage area, mean annual precipitation, mean basin <br />elevation and mean basin slope. The report "Uncompahgre Plateau and Glade Park Annual <br />Hydrograph Estimation" in Appendix C, explains staff's water availability analysis in more <br />detaiL Table 2 below displays the estimated stream flow of Dry Creek. <br /> <br />For this reach, the synthetic hydrograph shows that the summer flow recommendation of 7.3 cfs <br />is available only from April I to June 30. The summer flow recommendation was reduced to 3.0 <br />cfs for the time period of July I through July 31 based on limited water availability. The winter <br />flow recommendation of 5.3 cfs is not available at least 50% of the time. The winter flow <br />recommendation was reduced to 1.2 cfs for the period of August I to February 28, and to 3.0 cfs <br />from March I to March 31 based on limited water availability. <br /> <br />Table 2: Estimated Stream Flow on Dry Creek: <br />Jan Feb Mar Apr <br />(cts) 1.2 2.6 3.8 57.3 <br /> <br />May <br />208.9 <br /> <br />Jun <br />95.8 <br /> <br />JuJ <br />4.9 <br /> <br />Aug <br />1.9 <br /> <br />Sep <br />1.6 <br /> <br />Oet <br />1.5 <br /> <br />Nav <br />1.4 <br /> <br />Dee <br />1.3 <br /> <br />- 4- <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.