Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />STATE f)F COLORADO <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />721 Centennial Building <br />1 31 3 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3441 <br />fAX, (3031 866-4474 <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br /> <br />J.lmes S. Lochhead <br />Executive Director, DNR <br /> <br />Dilries C. tile, P.E. <br />Director, ewes <br /> <br />Mareh 20, 1998 <br /> <br />Roy Smith <br />Instream Flow Coordinator <br />Bureau of Land Management <br />2850 Youngfield Street, Mail = CO-932 <br />Lakewood, CO 80215 <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Trout Creek Water Availability Study and ISF Recommendations. <br /> <br />Dear Roy: <br /> <br />CWCB staff reviewed the BLM field data, the Trout Creek Synthetie Hydrograph derived <br />utilizing methods outlined in the USGS Water Resourees Investigations Report 85-4086 and <br />stream flow data from the USGS gages loeated on Coehetopa Creek below Roek Creek near <br />Parlin (ID# 09118450) and the Lake Fork of the Gunnison at Gateview (ID# 09115500). <br /> <br />Trout Creek - headwaters to Johnson Diteh head gate <br /> <br />Aeeording to gage reeords for Coehetopa Creek, the flow reeorded at this gage on August 6, <br />1996, was 14 efs or 46 efs below the August monthly median or 23% of the median. Likewise, <br />aeeording to gage reeords for the Lake Fork, the flow reeorded at this gage on August 6, 1996, <br />was 120 efs or 51 efs below the August monthly median or 70% of the median. The Trout Creek <br />drainage basin is smaller than both of these drainages. This eompiled with the August 1996 <br />Gunnison River Surfaee Water Supply Index Value of -0.7 (attaehed), indieates that basin water <br />supplies were below normal to well below normal at the time of the BLM field survey. <br /> <br />The BLM measured 0.36 efs on August 6, 1996, within this reaeh of stream and aeeording to the <br />SEa's Water Rights Tabulation the upstream diversions total 10.9 efs. The synthetie model <br />predieted the mean monthly flow for August to be between 2.9 and 10 efs, with the average being <br />approximately 6.5 efs. The synthetie model eorresponds extremely well with the basin area <br />apportioned averages assoeiated Lake Fork gage readings. Based on the data above the CWCB <br />feels the average flow for August is approximately 6.5 efs or 100% of the average flow predieted <br />by the synthetie model. However, we feel the lower terminus of the Trout Creek ISF reaeh <br />should be moved to the Johnson Ditch Headgate. Based on this reduction staff determined the <br />following stream flows are available for appropriation for the Trout Creek ISF reaeh: <br />