Laserfiche WebLink
<br />protecting flows to maintain adequate depth and physical habitat where pools are not available" <br />(see CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B). <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of field <br />data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based on <br />meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />Table 1: Data <br />Party <br />BLM <br /> <br />Date <br />08/25/1998 <br /> <br />Q <br />1.4 <br /> <br />250%-40% <br />3.6 - 0.6 <br /> <br />Summer (3/3) <br />1.7 <br /> <br />Winter (2/3) <br />1.3 <br /> <br />BLM = Bureau of Land Management DOW = Division of Wildlife <br />(1) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendation, which meets 3 of 3 criteria and is within the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model is 1.7 cfs (See Table 1). The winter flow recommendation, which meets <br />2 of 3 criteria and is inside the accuracy range of the R2CROSS model is 1.3 cfs (See Table 1). <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br /> <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff conducted <br />an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available for an <br />instream flow appropriation. The hydro graph below was derived from data collected by the <br />USGS stream gage for Gypsum Creek near Gypsum, CO (ill #09069500), which has a drainage <br />area of 62.7 square miles (See Gage Summary in Appendix C). The total drainage area of the <br />Cottonwood Creek Drainage upstream of Slaughter Spring Gulch is 9.3 square miles. The period <br />of record for this gage was 1950 to 1955 and 1965 to 1972, the period of record used by staff in <br />their analysis was 1950 to 1955 and 1965 to 1972, or 12 years of record. Table 2 below displays <br />- 3 - <br />