Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />Biological Data <br /> <br />The BLM has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported in the letter from BLM to the CWCB <br />"Fishery surveys indicate that the stream environment is presently in stable condition, and <br />supports a self-sustaining brook trout fishery. Channel stability, bank stability, water quality, <br />and pool habitat is good for salmonids" (See Fish Surveys in Appendix B). <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree, The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B contains copies of field <br />data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations, The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996), <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table I shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based on <br />meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />Table I: Data <br /> <br />Party Date Q 250%-40% Summer (3/3) Winter (2/3) <br />BLM 07/16/1996 0.14 0.3 - 0,1 ? 0.2 <br /> <br />BLM = Bureau of Land Management DOW = Division ofWildJife <br />(1) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. ? = Criteria never met in R2CROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Biologic Flow Recommendation <br />The summer flow recommendation. which meets 3 of 3 criteria, is outside the accuracy range of <br />the R2CROSS model (See Table 1). The winter flow recommendation, which meets 2 of 3 <br />criteria and is within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS model, is 0,15 cfs (See Table 1). <br /> <br />Hydrologic Data <br /> <br />After receiving the cooperating agency's biologic recommendation, the CWCB staff conducted <br />an evaluation of the stream hydrology to determine if water was physically available for an <br />instream flow appropriation. The hydro graph below was derived from data collected by the <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />