Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I ':.I~ <br /> <br />I <br />,. - - .. <br /> <br />(\ <br /> <br />~: <br />it_:,:: <br /> <br />----;.- <br /> <br />Case No. 87CW265 <br /> <br />\~ _fYtGW~S <br /> <br />DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 1, COLORADO <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />STIPULATION <br /> <br />IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF <br />THE COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD ON BEHALF OF <br />THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br /> <br />--------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />IN EAST FORK SHEEP CREEK, A NATURAL STREAM <br /> <br />IN THE WATERSHED OF THE CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER <br /> <br />IN LARIMER COUNTY, COLORADO. <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />COMES NOW the Objector, City of Ft. Collins (hereinafter <br />"Ft. Collins"), by and through its attorneys, Vranesh and Raisch, <br />and the Applicant, Colorado Water Conservation Board (hereinafter <br />"CWCB"), by and through the Attorney General, and stipulate as <br />follows: <br /> <br />l. The CWCB filed the Application in this case on Decem- <br />ber 2l, 1987. <br /> <br />2. The City of Ft. Collins a Statement of Opposition <br />dated February 25, 1988. <br /> <br />3. After reviewing information provided by Ft. Collins, <br />its own files and its other instream flow rights, the CWCB has <br />determined that the downstream terminus of the requested instream <br />flow in this case should be moved approximately .6 miles from the <br />confluence with the West Fork of Sheep Creek to the confluence <br />with an unnamed tributary as illustrated on the map attached <br />hereto as Exhibit 1 and as more fully described in paragraph 4 of <br />the proposed decree attached hereto as Attachment A. <br /> <br />4. This change removes Ft. Collins' concerns over poten- <br />tial conflicts between the proposed instream flow and its water <br />rights. Therefore, Ft. Collins will not object to the entry of a <br />decree which is SUbstantially in the form of, and no less <br />restrictive than, the proposed decree (Attachment A). <br />