Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pat McNulty Ditch CA 579 (Garfield 31l5/1894 5/28/1888 0.5 CFS of Coulter Creek <br />No.2 County District which, Valley Ranch, Ltd. <br /> Court) Peterson <br /> w owns (0.47 <br /> CFS) <br />Teal Pond 99CWI73 (Water 12/311l999 9/011l975 0.90 AF James D. Peterson <br /> Div. No.5) and Hensley R. <br /> Peterson <br />Tom's Spring W.1898 (Water 12/31/1973 12/31/1910 1.5 CFS James D. Peterson <br /> Diy. No.5) and Hensley R. <br /> Peterson <br />Ralston No.1 Ditch CA 298 (Garfield 041l81l890 10/01/1884 1.0CFS Coulter Creek <br /> County District Valley Ranch, Ltd. <br /> Court) <br /> <br />3. Coulter Creek Valley Ranch, Ltd. is also the owner of 20% of the shares in the <br />Consolidated Reservoir, Inc., which owns the following water rights: <br /> <br /> .......i<:;(jN$(jI:;!J:):?\.~:EJ:)FE$ERy(jJR...)Y~j;:ER.mg!-lj;$i..... '.it <br /> .. <br />Structure Decreed Priority No. Decreed Adjudication Appropriation c.A. <br /> Amount Location Date Date (Garfield <br /> (absolute) Sec. 19, County <br /> T. 6 S., District Court) <br /> R. 87 W. <br />Con. Res. 595.0 AF 8B NEINE 2/151l921 9/81l898 2144 <br />Con. Res. 285.6 AF 678 NEINE 6/201l958 9/1/1948 4613 <br />Con. Res. 401.0 AF 754 NEINE 11/5/1971 9/1/1948 5884 <br /> <br />4. CWCB agrees that the instream flow right decreed in this case is subject to and shall <br />be administered as junior to the water rights described above in paragraphs 2 and 3. CWCB will not <br />prevent operation of the Objector's senior water rights described above at paragraphs 2 and 3 at the <br />existing points of diversion and place of storage, and will not object to any repairs or improvements <br />that Objector may make to the structures and appurtenances associated with the diversion, storage <br />or use ofthe Objector's said senior water rights. <br /> <br />5. The CWCB agrees that it will operate its water rights within the prior appropriation <br />system, and that the water right decreed in this case and the water right decreed to the CWCB in <br />Case No. 85CW626 (collectively referred to herein as the "CWCB Cattle Creek rights") are not <br />intended by the CWCB to be used directly or indirectly as a basis for the imposition of bypass flows <br />or other regulatory requirements for the purpose of providing flows to Cattle Creek, the Roaring <br />Fork River, or the Colorado River, whether through permit proceedings or other regulatory actions. <br /> <br />6. The CWCB agrees that it cannot call for any releases from the Consolidated Reservoir <br /> <br />Case No. 97CW273 <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Stipulation <br />Page 2 <br />