Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.," <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Filed In The DistrIct Courl <br />Water O1vis!o:J Four <br /> <br />DATE OF MAILING <br />'-' 'S~~H?5 . <br /> <br />MAY 8 1985 <br /> <br />DISTRICT COURT. WATER DIVISION 4. COLORADO <br /> <br />Kay Fi1iaips. Clerk <br /> <br />Case No. 82CW253 <br />* <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />RULING OF REFEREE. JUDGMENT AND DECREE <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />CONCE~NING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF THE COLORADO wATER <br />CONSE~VATION BOARD ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF <br />COLQUDO <br /> <br />I~ ~UTRAS CREEK. A NATURAL STREAM <br /> <br />IN THE WATERSHED OF THE GUNNISON RIVER <br /> <br />IN SAGUACHE COUNTY <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />THIS MATTER. having come On before the court on tne appli- <br />cation of the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the court <br />being fully advised as to the matter of the application herein. <br />hereby ~akes the following findings: <br /> <br />The a~plication herein was filed with tne water clerk. <br />water Division 4. on September 16. 1982. On July 15. 1983 the <br />court entered an order granting relief from strict conformity <br />with local court rule 2-4(1) by allowing the applicant to <br />describe stream segments in unsurveyed areas by longitude and <br />latitude. On July 21. 1983. tn~ applicant filed a first supple- <br />ment to tne application reflecting the incorporation by reference <br />of an informational map showing the relative location of tne <br />instream flow segment claimed in the application. All notices <br />required by law for the filing of this application have been ful- <br />filled. and the court has juriSdiction over the application. <br /> <br />N~ statements of opposition were filed to tnis application. <br /> <br />All matters contained in tne application have been reviewed <br />and testimony taken where such testimony is necessary and the <br />court finds that the statements c~ntained in the application are <br />true and that applicant is entitled to the water right requested <br />in the application. <br />