My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPP00701
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
ISFAPP00701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2016 12:04:42 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 10:20:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
85CW0653
Stream Name
Buffalo Creek
Watershed
Willow Creek
Water Division
5
Water District
51
County
Grand
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Final Decree/Stipulations
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RICHARD D. LAMM <br />Governor <br />FFL <br />)Su <br />JERIS A. DANIELSON <br />State Engineer <br />'N + 1 ,,,, <br />h ,: <br />DIVIS1ON OF WATER RESOURCES <br />WATER DIVISION V .WR 1 0 lib <br />ORLYN J. BELL <br />DIVISION ENGINEER <br />P.O. BOX 396 <br />1429 GRAND AVENUE CLERK <br />GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 <br />945 -5665 <br />RECOMMENDATION OF THE DIVISION ENGINEER OF WATER DIVISION V <br />SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION <br />CASE NUMBER AND NAME: 85CW653; Buffalo Creek <br />COMMENTS <br />1 <br />x Material in Application is adequate and timely. <br />2. Proof of claimed date of initiation of appropriation appears inadequate. <br />3. Proof of amopnt of water claimed appears inadequate. <br />4. No proof of proposed use of water. <br />• Legal description of lands and diversion show ownership other than. <br />6. Legal description of point of diversion inadequate. <br />7, Amount of water claimed appears excessive for proposed use. <br />8, (Insert comment) <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />1, X Application should be issued by Referee as a Ruling. <br />2. Application should be denied by Water Referee. <br />3. Application should be amended and resubmitted to the court. <br />4. Applicant should furnish additional proof to the Referee. <br />5. No proof of use - Ruling should be conditional. <br />6. Other: (Insert recommendation) - <br />Dated: <br />3/10/86 <br />ris " Engineer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.