Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ . , <br />..... .~! \ <br />~;;;.> <br /> <br />~~. ,,~ <br /> <br />.~.. <br />" <br /> <br />. <br />, <br />.....'<>, <br />:~\.'" <br />, <br /> <br />,~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />" <br />-~-,-' <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />...."'.. <br />;'.~ <br /> <br />'. ~ <br /> <br />>:. '. <br /> <br />.~' <br /> <br />~,; <br />" <br />..... <br />.."'.- <br />;""')1 <br /> <br />~~{;~..: <br />.\~ <br />'/~. <br />,f~:Y"':: <br /> <br />I. ~ <br />~ - :~.:: <br />j "~'''' <br />-,,~ ';:" <br />L.', <br />" ~'-i.. <br />'1,'- . <br /> <br />~~:...':. <br /> <br />'t.t..\.-: <br />.: ':l. ~ <br />\~~:' <br />':''1-..... <br />~.../,1.. <br />,';,;" <br />'\ ~<' <br /> <br />~~::~; -' <br /> <br />~!. ~J.... <br />-' '!'. <br /> <br />r'.. <br /> <br />'. <br />" <br /> <br />.' 'to <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />~,'~ . <br /> <br />'.:'7 <br /> <br />'., <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />it, and ~ remains applicable now that the legislature has <br /> <br />changed the statutory scheme. <br />1he Court concludes that an appropriat~on without <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />diversion was intended by the legislature, is not forbidden <br />by the Constitutio;, and is permitted by decisions of the <br /> <br />Supreme Court. As discussed above, those decisions requiring <br /> <br />an actual physical diversion do so for a variety of reasons <br />not related to the constitut~onal terminology. <br />001 <br />The Court will uphold the acts of the general assem- <br />bly unless the unconstitutionality thereof is clearly shown, <br /> <br />Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir v. Southworth, 13 Colo. 111 <br />(1889), and as the unconstitutionality has not been shown,the <br /> <br />Court concludes that Senate Bill 97 is a proper constitutional <br /> <br />enactment. <br /> <br />xv. <br /> <br />The Court concludes that the use for which the water <br /> <br />is claimed is a legitimate beneficial use as objectors have <br /> <br />conceded. See Denver v. Sheriff, 105 Colo. 193 (1936). <br /> <br />XVI. <br /> <br />The right to appropriate water guaranteed by Section <br />6, Article XVI of the Colorado Constitution runs only to the <br />"unappropriated waters". By the language of Senate Dill 97, <br /> <br />the appropriation permitted can be only of those waters pre- <br /> <br />sently unappropriated. 1he legislature has declared that the <br />actions of the applicant will result in an appropriation, sub- <br /> <br />ject to the same restrictions and rights as any other junior <br />water right. The Court concludes that the waters thus identi- <br /> <br />fied are no longer unapprop~iatcd ,and are not subject to addi- <br />tional appropriation, as argued by the objectors. <br /> <br />DlVII <br /> <br />The Court concludes that the objectors' argument that <br /> <br />the water constitutionally belongs to the people and that the <br /> <br />":' 13 - <br /> <br />>:~ . <br /> <br />-' ..~ - <br />