Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5, Stipulations are appropriate in this type of circumstance where a party <br />stipulates or makes an agreement concerning a valuable property right. Moreover, the Court <br />should recognize such stipulation when such stipulation does not violate rules of public <br />policy, Kempter v. Hurd, 713 P,2d 1274 (Colo. 1986), Court approval of a stipulation is <br />especially appropriate in a case such as this where no questions oflaw are raised and where <br />the stipulation does not create manifest injustice, Bar 70 Enterprises, lnc, v, Tasca Corp" <br />703 P,2d 1297 (Colo, 1985); Lake Meredith Reservoir Co, v, Amiti Mut, lrri, Co" 698 P,2d <br />1340 (Colo, 1985). <br /> <br />6, Counsel for the CWCB has conferred with Andrew Petemell, Counsel for <br />the objector, who has consented to this Motion, <br /> <br />WHEREFORE the CWCB moves this Court to enter an Order approving the <br />Stipulation entered into between the CWCB and Trout Unlimited, and enter the attached <br />Findings and Ruling of the Referee and Decree of the Water Court, <br /> <br />Dated this 7th day of April, 2006, <br /> <br />JOHN W, SUTHERS <br /> <br />Attorney General <br />E-filed pursuant to C,R.C.P. 121. Duly signed original on file <br />at the Office afthe Attorney General. <br /> <br />~~ginia B?n~/ ' <br /> <br />\ ) r ~l,^, {j, ~(,flI"\ ./\'C1'- <br />VIRGINIA BRANNON, ESQ, <br />Assistant Attorney General <br />Natural Resources and Environment Section <br /> <br />Attorneys for CWCB <br />Counsel of Record <br />