Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />90CW304 <br />Water Div. 5 <br /> <br />segment, that is consistent with this conditionally <br />decreed storage right, If the ultimate perfection <br />of this conditionally decreed storage right <br />involves a redesign or reconfiguration of the <br />facility, including a change in place of storage, <br />the CWCB will not oppose the entry of a decree <br />changing the storage rights provided the proposed <br />storage vessel is located within this instream flow <br />segment, and provided Denver includes as a term and <br />condition that it will bypass the instream flows <br />decreed herein between the original and the changed <br />point of diversion, <br /> <br />c, The CWCB recognizes that water stored in <br />upstream reservoirs or diverted from other basins <br />may be released or delivered into St, Louis Creek <br />to be diverted at downstream points, The CWCB <br />shall not prevent or otherwise limit Denver from <br />being able to releas<l or deliver water diverted <br />under or stored under Civil Action 657 or Civil <br />Action 1430 into this segment or assert injury to <br />its appropriation due to such releases or <br />deliveries, <br /> <br />d. The CWCB shall not claim injury or any adverse <br />affect from Denver's performance under the Clinton- <br />Fraser Agreement dated July 21, 1992, <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> <br />5, Jurisdiction: The Referee has jurisdiction over <br />this proceeding. The CWCB has complied with the required <br />statutory requirements, full and adequate notice of the CWCB's <br />claims have been given in the manner required by law and no <br />additional notice needs to be given, The Court has <br />jurisdiction over the subject matter and over all persons with <br />standing to become parties in this case, whether they have <br />appeared or not, <br /> <br />6, Incorporation of Findinos of Fact: The foregoing <br />findings of fact are incorporated herein to the extent that <br />they constitute conclusions of law, <br /> <br />7, Standards and Burdens of Proof: The CWCB has <br />complied with all requirements, has met all standards and <br />burdens of proof regarding the Board's appropriation of the <br />Instream Flow water rights requested in the Application filed <br />in this case, and is therefore entitled to a Ruling confirming <br />and approving its Instream Flow water rights as more fully <br />described in paragraph 3 above. <br />