Laserfiche WebLink
<br />90CW285 <br />Water Div. 5 <br /> <br />terminus <br />follows: <br />TIN R74W <br /> <br />as protracted from U.S.G.S. mapping is as <br />upstream terminus in the NW/4 SE/4 829 <br />6PM. <br /> <br />c. Amount of water appropriated: <br />ABSOLUTE ( May 1 September 30); <br />ABSOLUTE (October 1 - April 30). <br /> <br />2.5 c.f.s. <br />0.5 c.f.s. <br /> <br />d. Appropriation date: November 27, 1990. The <br />appropriation was initiated and water first put to <br />beneficial use on November 27, 1990, by action of <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board under ~~ 37- <br />92-102(3), 103(3), 103(4), and 103(10), C.R.S. <br />(1990 Repl. Vol. 15). <br /> <br />e. Use of Water: For Instream Flows to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. <br /> <br />4. Proposed terms and conditions: Denver is the oWner <br />and user of senior water rights and owns and maintains <br />diversion structures above the instream flow segment that is <br />the subject of this application. Denver diverts water from <br />Meadow Creek either directly or by exchange under decrees <br />entered in Civil Action Nos. 657 and 1.430. The CWCB <br />recognizes and will not contest that these water rights are <br />senior to the instream flow appropriation. Nor will the CWCB <br />oppose the perfection of, or application for a finding of <br />diligence for these senior conditional water rights. Further, <br />the CWCB will not claim or assert injury to its water rights <br />from Denver's operation of the senior water rights at the <br />existing ,points of diversion located above this instream flow <br />segment. Moreover, the CWCB will not prevent Denver's <br />operation of its senior rights at the existing points of <br />diversion located above the subject instream flow segment. <br />"Denver's operation" shall include any operations, <br />maintenance, repairs, or replacement of these diversion <br />structures and their appurtenant structures, as determined <br />necessary by Denver. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> <br />5. Jurisdiction: The Referee has jurisdiction over <br />this proceeding. The CWCB has complied with the required <br />statutory requirements, full and adequate notice of the CWCB's <br />claims have been given in the manner required by law and no <br />additional notice needs to be given. The Court has <br />jurisdiction over the subject matter and overall persons with <br />standing to become parties in this case, whether they have <br />appeared or not. <br />