Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 6, COLORADO <br /> <br />t"ILt:'.U VVA' <br />STATE OF ~~I"(LOUIV. 0 <br />RADO <br />A(JG 72 7994 <br /> <br />Case No. 92CW082 <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />RULING OF REFEREE AND DECREE OF THE WATER COURT <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF <br />THE COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD ON BEHALF OF <br />THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />::-_" 'c-- " <br /> <br />IN PINE CREEK, A NATURAL STREAM <br /> <br />IN THE WATERSHED OF THE YAMPA RIVER <br /> <br />IN RIO BLANCO AND MOFFAT COUNTIES, COLORADO. <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />The above captioned Application was filed on December 11, <br />1992, and was referred to the Water Referee for Water Division <br />No.6, in accordance with C.R.S. 37-92-101, et seq. (1990 Repl. <br />Vol. 15). All notices of the filing of this Application which <br />are required by law have been fulfilled and the Referee has <br />jurisdiction of this Application. <br /> <br />On March 5, 1993, the Division Engineer submitted a Sum- <br />mary of Consultation recommending approval of the Application. <br /> <br />A Statement of Opposition was filed by sixteen (16) indi- <br />viduals. Fifteen of the sixteen individual Objectors have en- <br />tered into a Stipulation with the Applicant which was approved by <br />the Referee on May 20, 1994. <br /> <br />To resolve the Objectors' concerns with the Application <br />filed in this case, the CWCB has agreed that: <br /> <br />a. it will not oppose, object to or protest an applica- <br />tion filed by any of the Objectors in this case who wish to <br />change any current point of diversion, located within the <br />minimum stream flow reach applied for in this case, to a <br />new point of diversion so long as the Objector is entitled <br />to extend the head of such ditch pursuant to the provisions <br />of C.R.S. 37-86-111. <br /> <br />b. The current statutory provisions permitting the fil- <br />