My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPP00292
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
ISFAPP00292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2016 12:04:00 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 10:18:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
05CW0148
Stream Name
Cornet Creek
Watershed
San Miguel River
Water Division
4
Water District
60
County
San Miguel
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Final Decree/Stipulations
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 4 <br />COLORADO <br />1200 N. Grand Ave., Bin A <br />Montrose,CO 81401-3\46 <br />Concerning The Application For Water Rights Of: <br />COLORADO WATER CONSER V A TION BOARD, <br />IN CORNET CREEK, A NATURAL STREAM, <br />IN THE WATERSHED OF SAN MIGUEL, <br />IN SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, COLORADO. <br /> ... COURT USE ONLY ... <br />JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General Case No.: OSCWI48 <br />VIRGINIA BRANNON', Assistant Attorney General <br />1525 Sherman Street, 5th Floor Div.: 4 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />(303) 866-5118 <br />Registration Number: 30346 <br />'Counsel of Record <br />MOTION TO APPROVE STIPULATION AND ENTER FINDINGS AND RULING <br />OF THE REFEREE AND DECREE OF THE WATER COURT <br /> <br />The Applicant, the Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB"), through its <br />undersigned counsel, moves this Court to approve the Stipulation entered into with the <br />objector, Trout Unlimited, and to enter the attached Findings and Ruling of the Water <br />Court. As grounds therefore, the CWCB states as follows: <br /> <br />I. Trout Unlimited is the only objector to this case. <br /> <br />2. The CWCB and Trout Unlimited entered into a Stipulation, dated April 6, <br />2006, which resolved the disputed issues between the parties. The Stipulation is attached <br />hereto. <br /> <br />3. Approval of the Stipulation between the CWCB and Trout Unlimited will <br />facilitate an efficient resolution of this matter. <br /> <br />4. In situations such as this, when litigants have settled their disputes by <br />stipulation, it is appropriate for such parties to file stipulations with the Court. It is further <br />appropriate for the Court to accept such stipulations or state solid reasons why the <br />stipulation should not be accepted. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Bar <br />Forty Seven Co., 579 P.2d 636 (1978); US v. Northern Colorado Conservancy District, <br />608 F.2d 422 (lOth Cir. 1979). <br /> <br />5. Stipulations are appropriate in this type of circumstance where a party <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.