ISFAPP00076 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,~ E-FILED DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 4 COLORADO 1200 N. Grand Ave., Bin A Montrose, CO 81401-3146 Concerning The Application For Water Rights Of: _:.....,'; \ .:_ 0.~\.st;t '.ICj:~ 'Mater O.'JtS1on 4 COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD, IN THE SAN MIGUEL RIVER, A NATURAL STREAM, IN THE WATERSHED OF SAN MIGUEL, IN SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, COLORADO. t.. .'. I ,. ,"'}"r' L~~O I JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General ALEXANDRA L. DAVIS, Assistant Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street, 51h Floor Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-5713 Registmtion Number: 24531 *Counsel of Record ... COURT USE ONLY ... Case No.: 02CW277 Div.: 4 I MOTION TO APPROVE STIPULATION AND ENTER FINDINGS AND RULING OF THE REFEREE AND DECREE OF THE WATER COURT The Applicant, the Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB"), through its undersigned counsel, moves this Court to approve the Stipulation entered into with the objector, JC Mesa, LLC, and to enter the attached Findings and Ruling of the Water Court. As grounds therefore, the CWCB states as follows: 1. JC Mesa, LLC, is the remaining objector to this case. All other objectors have entered into stipulations with the Colorado Water Conservation Board. 2. The CWCB and JC Mesa, LLC, entered into a Stipulation, dated April 10, 2006, which resolved the disputed issues between the parties. The Stipulation is attached hereto.' , 3. Approval of the Stipulation between the CWCB and JC Mesa, LLC, will facilitate an efficient resolution of this matter. 4. In situations such as this, when litigants have settled their disputes by stipulation, it is appropriate for such parties to file stipulations with the Court. It is further appropriate for the Court to accept such stipulations or state solid reasons why the stipulation should not be accepted. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Bar Forty Seven Co., 579 P.2d 636 (1978); u.s. v. Northern Colorado Conservancy District, 608 F.2d 422 (10th Cir. 1979).