My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10307
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:48 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 5:05:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Guidelines for Determining Flood Hazards on Alluvial Fans
Date
2/23/2000
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />'. <br />. <br />I. <br />.. <br />i. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />02/23/00 <br /> <br />SC Sheetflow <br /> <br />Assumptions: broad, unconfined, shallow flooding <br /> <br />Limitations: not for use in areas of undulating terrain <br /> <br />Recommended Applications: shallow flooding across uniformly sloping surfaces <br /> <br />Please refer to Appendix 2 of FEMA 37, Flood Insurance Study Guidelines and Specifications for <br />Study Contractors, for guidelines on the analysis and mapping of shallow flooding. Although it is <br />stated in Appendix 2 that the procedures are not to be used for alluvial fan flooding, the approach <br />established by this document enables the use of those methods described in Appendix 2, except for <br />highly active conical fans that are studied using the FAN program. <br /> <br />SD Hydraulic Analytical Methods <br /> <br />Assumptions: stable flow path, uncertainty is to a degree that may be disregarded <br /> <br />Limitations: not for use with active alluvial fan flooding <br /> <br />Recommended Applications: entrenched stable channels and channel networks, constructed <br />channels, urbanized areas <br /> <br />Inactive, yet floodprone areas should use "riverine" hydraulic analytical methods. Where flow paths <br />are stable and flow is reasonably confined, standard hydraulic engineering methods such as <br />backwater computations may be used to define the elevation (or depth), velocity and extent of the <br />100-year flood. Hydraulic methods may also be used for stable channel networks when applicable. <br />F or example, relict alluvial fans or inactive fans with stable channels, as determined by a geomorphic <br />analysis, may be subject to flow splits throughout the distributary system that exists. Hydraulic <br />modeling can generally handle split-flow analyses through stream junctions of this type. In general, <br />for stable channels on alluvial fans, physically based methods that consider site processes and <br />hydraulics, such as channel geometry, grade and roughness, and channel bank and bed material are <br />preferred. <br /> <br />Where precise computations of water-surface profiles using energy and momentum based methods <br />may not be feasible based on the scope of the study, the use of normal depth calculations for <br />definition of approximate 100-year flood boundaries may be warranted. <br /> <br />Chapter 5 ofFEMA 37 provides guidelines for hydraulic analytical methods. Within Section D of <br />Chapter 5, several methods applicable to conditions found on alluvial fans are described. These <br />methods include two-dimensional water-surface models, modeling techniques of streams with <br />supercritical flow regimes, and split-flow analysis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.