Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />- <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />02/23/00 <br /> <br />and the boundaries of channels become indiscernible. They are also more common at distal <br />locations because of the likelihood of fine-grained sediments and shallow groundwater; during <br />prolonged rainfall, the ground can become saturated, resulting in extensive sheetflooding as runoff <br />arrives from upslope. Fine-grained sediments can aggravate the likelihood of sheetflow because <br />some clay minerals swell when wet, forming an impermeable surface at the beginning of a rainstorm. <br /> <br />4D (3) Debris Flow <br /> <br />Some parts of alluvial fans are characterized by debris flows, flows with a very high concentration <br />of sediment in relation to water. Debris flows pose hazards that are very different from those of <br />sheetflows or water flows in channels. IdentifYing those parts of alluvial fans where debris flow <br />deposition might occur requires the examination of deposits from past flows. Debris flow deposits <br />can be distinguished from fluvial deposits by differences in morphology, depositional relief, <br />stratigraphy, and clast fabric. Exposures in channel banks can be examined and can be supplemented <br />with shallow trenches in different deposits. <br /> <br />4D (4) Unstable Flow Path Flooding <br /> <br />Active areas of an alluvial fan will generally be characterized by unstable and uncertain flow path <br />flooding. This type of flooding usually creates a single channel just below the apex, but splits into <br />multiple channels as it proceeds down the alluvial fan. These channels are subject to deposition and <br />bank or bottom erosion that cause channel migration, avulsion, and the formation of new charmels. <br />Areas subject to this type of flooding are characterized by shallow, braided or distributary, sand- <br />to gravel-bed channels. Recently formed channels may have less established vegetation, such as <br />trees, than older channels in the same general area. <br /> <br />5 STAGE 3: DEFINING THE 100- YEAR FLOOD WITHIN THE DEFINED AREAS <br /> <br />The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) uses the 100-year flood, the flood having a I-percent <br />chance of being exceeded in any given year, to delineate Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA). <br />Stages I and 2 describe methods of identifYing alluvial fan landforms and areas of active and <br />inactive deposition, erosion, and unstable flow path flooding. Stage 3 determines the severity and <br />delineates the extent of the 100-year flood within any floodprone area identified in Stage 2. <br /> <br />The broad spectrum of alluvial fan landforms and types of flooding illustrates, as previously <br />discussed, the futility of developing a "cookbook" method to apply to all fans in all geographic areas. <br />The analysis of the flood hazards on alluvial fans therefore requires a flexible approach that is based <br />on site-specific evaluations. Several methods for quantifYing the 1 DO-year flood are presented in the <br />following sections and are summarized in Table I. Not all methods are appropriate for all situations. <br />The assumptions and limitations of each should be carefully considered in deciding which methods <br />to apply to particular areas of an alluvial fan. Example maps resulting from the application of some <br />of the available methods are included in Appendix I. <br />