Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />I ~~ <br />1 ~;I. <br /> <br />1 H D R <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />1"1 <br /> <br />HDR Engineering, Inc. <br /> <br />Suite 300 <br />303 East 17th Avenue <br />Denver, Colorado <br />80203-1256 <br /> <br />Telephone: <br />303861-1300 <br /> <br />May 31, 1989 <br /> <br />Mr. Uli Kappus, P.E., Executive Director <br />Colorado Water Resources and <br />Power Development Authority <br />1580 Logan Street, Suite 620 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />Re: Final Report for the Upper <br />Gunnison-Uncompahgre Basin <br />Phase 1 Feasibility Study <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Kappus: <br /> <br />We are pleased to submit this Final Report as required by our <br />contract dated June 5, 1987. Five interim Task Memoranda have been <br />submitted previously, each reporting in detail on certain aspects of <br />the study. A SUlll11ary Report which discusses the study in a more <br />concise manner is submitted under separate cover. <br /> <br />The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate water <br />resource management plans to enhance the water-based economy of the <br />Study Area in an environmentally sound manner. Both structural and <br />non-structural components have been examined, evaluated and utilized <br />to formulate a lternat i ve pl ans whi ch woul d meet in-bas in needs. A <br />recommended plan has been identified which meets the study objective. <br /> <br />Non-structural measures related to the municipal anQ industrial <br />sector were found to have 1 ittle potential for saving water in the <br />context of this basin-wide study because the total consumptive use in <br />this sector is less than two percent of the total consumptive use in <br />the entire Study Area at present. Some of the measures identi fied <br />should be considered for implementation at the local level in the <br />future, however. Non-structural measures identified in the <br />agricultural sector were determined to be either technically or <br />economically infeasible except for water rights exchanges and/or <br />transfers and drought leasing. <br /> <br />Six alternative development plans were evaluated as a means of <br />meeting future water demands and enhancing water-based recreation in <br />the Study Area. The preferred plan consists of the following: a <br />20,000 acre-foot multipurpose reservoir in the Ohio Creek basin; a <br />25,000 acre-foot multipurpose storage reservoir in the Tomichi Creek <br />basin; and ten recreation enhancement components. The total capital <br />cost of this plan is approximately $55 million (January 1989 price <br />level). <br /> <br />I 10003114 <br />