<br />356
<br />
<br />GRANT: CRITICAL FLOW CONSTRAINS FLOW HYDRAULICS
<br />
<br />The relation between Froude number and flow resistance is
<br />more complex but may result in maximization of friction factor
<br />at critical flow. In general, the Froude number is inversely
<br />related to the Darcy- Weisbach friction factor,f, by
<br />
<br />v' 8
<br />Fr' = - = - S
<br />gd f
<br />
<br />where
<br />
<br />G),,=:.
<br />
<br />Flume studies with flow over obstructions on fixed beds have
<br />shown that at low relative submergences (ylD5o < 0,5), the
<br />drag coefficient tends to be maximized at critical flow [Flammer
<br />el ai" 1970J, At higher relative submergences the peak drag
<br />occurs at lower Froude numbers. This effect appears to be due
<br />to the increased free surface drag resulting from hydraulic
<br />jumps and free surface distortions over submerged roughness
<br />elements at critical flow [Balhursl el aI., 1979]. Step-pool chan-
<br />nels retain this highly dissipative morphology at less-than-
<br />formative flowN becaulle of the immobility of clasts forming
<br />steps. Recent work demonstrates that step spacing obsel'Yod In
<br />natural channels may correspond with maximum flow resis-
<br />tance at formative [Ashida et a/., 1986] and less-than-formative
<br />[Abrahams el ai" 1995] discharges, By the model proposed
<br />here, maximization of friction factor must be viewed as a cor-
<br />ollary to channel and flow adjustments rather than as a cause
<br />of them, as some extremal value theories have argued [Davies
<br />and Slither/and, 1980, 1983; Abrahams el a/., 1995J, Flow may
<br />still be critical at less than effective discharges; tumbling flow
<br />over static large roughness elements tends to be at or near
<br />critical [Morris. 1968]. Under these conditions, however, flow
<br />and channel geometry are not necessarily in equilibrium. so
<br />channel geometry is a relict of some more formative discharge.
<br />In contrast to step-pool channels, which preserve bed mor-
<br />phologies developed at critical flow, antidune structures gen-
<br />erated near critical flow in sand,bed systems are typically de-
<br />stroyed as flows wane, although an internal antidune
<br />stratification may be preserved [Middlelon, 1965; Hand el ai"
<br />1969]. This erasure of bed forms occurs because sand-bed
<br />streams tend to be competent over a much wider range of
<br />flows; hence bed morphology continues to adjust. In some
<br />cases the standing wave/antidune flow structure is maintained
<br />'as flows recede, although the amplitude and wavelength dimin-
<br />ish mMkedly. I have observed tiny sequences of standing waves
<br />in very shallow flows on the Oregon beach. Coarser gravel
<br />channels are in between sand-bed and boulder-bed streams,
<br />and a distinct relict antidune structure may be preserved as
<br />gravel lenses [Foley, 1977] or transverse ribs [Boothroyd and
<br />Ashley, 1975; Church and Gilbert, 1975; Rusland G051in, 1981J,
<br />Jia [1990J argued that the equilibrium bed morphology for
<br />sand channels tends to minimize Froude number. This conclu-
<br />s;on was derived from computer simulations of channels in the
<br />subcritical flow regime, mostly below the 0.01 slope threshold,
<br />In these simulations, where the slope equaled or exceeded
<br />0.01. the minimum Froude number for the equilibrium channel
<br />approached 1.0 (cf, Figures 3 and 4 and Table 1 offia [1990]),
<br />The clustering of empirical points close to the threshold, as
<br />opposed to the active-bed lines, in Figure 4 similarly suggests
<br />that the Froude number wiJI not exceed one for a given set of
<br />flow conditions.
<br />In sand.bed streams, oscillation around critical flow occurs
<br />
<br />(15)
<br />
<br />in both time (i,e" Figure 2b) and space (i,e" longitudinal se-
<br />quences of standing waves), but in boulder,bed and bedrock
<br />channels the oscillation occurs primarily in space, as the result
<br />of longitudinal accelerations and decelerations through the
<br />critical threshold. This is well illustrated in the paleohydraulie
<br />reconstructions of the Bonneville Floods [O'Connor, 1993J,
<br />Kieffer's [1987] detailed study of the hydraulics of rapids in the
<br />Grand Canyon also demonstrates this spatial variation, al-
<br />though she points out that flow may, vary temporally because of
<br />surges and pulses similar to those observed in sand-bed
<br />streams. Release of water from breaking standing waves may
<br />produce unsteady flow, even if bed forms are not destroyed.
<br />Further validation of this hypothesis poses logistical but not
<br />technical problems. Needed are instantaneous measurements
<br />of velocities and depths for cross sections representing a range
<br />of stream gradients and types, under high flow conditions when
<br />bed load transport is active. Instantaneous measurements are
<br />required because of the strongly unsteady nature of high flows,
<br />The primary logistical problems are access to high flows in
<br />steep channels and accurate measurements of velocity and
<br />depth in channels undergoing rapid bed deformation and sed-
<br />iment tninsport. Examination of lItream JjA\lge flilQOn-'lt U\ I~"n.
<br />t1ty sitos with high Proude number flows provides a first cut at
<br />caodidate sites [Wahl, 1993J,
<br />From a practical standpoint an assumption of critical flow
<br />would dramatically simplify the many problems associated with
<br />predicting how floods behave in steep channels. Assumption of
<br />critical flow would essentially replace the standard resistance
<br />equations, such as Manning's or Chezy's, with the equation
<br />v = (gd)O,'- Establishing the discharge of paleofloods in
<br />steep channels for hazard assessments, climate change analy-
<br />ses, or land-use planning could then proceed by calculating the
<br />velocity directly from the depth of flow, as determined from
<br />flood deposit stratigraphy or shear stress considerations. In
<br />fact, this assumption has already been proposed on empirical
<br />grounds alone, with good results [Ai/en, 1982, p, 411J,
<br />
<br />(16)
<br />
<br />Conclusions
<br />
<br />Interactions between the water surface an-d bed forms are
<br />proposed to maintain competent flows in mobile channels to
<br />Fr :5 1, Competent, high-gradient streams with beds ranging
<br />from sand to boulders typically achieve an equilibrium adjust-
<br />ment between the flow, sediment transport, and channel mor-
<br />phology at or near critical flow, Under this unique hydraulic
<br />condition the maximum amount of water can be transmitted
<br />downstream for the available energy, and the tendency for flow
<br />acceleration is balanced by development of bed forms and Row
<br />structures that offset that tendency by dissipating flow energy,
<br />The adjustment to a critical flow tbresbold is a dynamic one,
<br />involving feedbacks between tbe free surface,' bed configura-
<br />tion, flow resistance, and the sediment transport rate, In ,and-
<br />bed channels this dynamic equilibrium generates pulsating flow
<br />with a concomitant nonuniform and unsteady flow field. In
<br />coarser~grained systems this oscillatory flow pattern is -sup-
<br />pressed somewhat by the lower bed load transport rates, more
<br />cbaotic structure of both the bed and the flow, and the impor-
<br />tance of particle interactions; that is, collisions. imbrication.
<br />and lodging of very large particles influence the hcd forms, The
<br />hypothesis that high-gradient streams adjust their hydraulics
<br />according to a common principle deserves further empirical
<br />and laboratory testing. If validated, it offers a simple. useful
<br />means of predicting flow hydraulics in mountain stream"
<br />
|