Laserfiche WebLink
<br />356 <br /> <br />GRANT: CRITICAL FLOW CONSTRAINS FLOW HYDRAULICS <br /> <br />The relation between Froude number and flow resistance is <br />more complex but may result in maximization of friction factor <br />at critical flow. In general, the Froude number is inversely <br />related to the Darcy- Weisbach friction factor,f, by <br /> <br />v' 8 <br />Fr' = - = - S <br />gd f <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />G),,=:. <br /> <br />Flume studies with flow over obstructions on fixed beds have <br />shown that at low relative submergences (ylD5o < 0,5), the <br />drag coefficient tends to be maximized at critical flow [Flammer <br />el ai" 1970J, At higher relative submergences the peak drag <br />occurs at lower Froude numbers. This effect appears to be due <br />to the increased free surface drag resulting from hydraulic <br />jumps and free surface distortions over submerged roughness <br />elements at critical flow [Balhursl el aI., 1979]. Step-pool chan- <br />nels retain this highly dissipative morphology at less-than- <br />formative flowN becaulle of the immobility of clasts forming <br />steps. Recent work demonstrates that step spacing obsel'Yod In <br />natural channels may correspond with maximum flow resis- <br />tance at formative [Ashida et a/., 1986] and less-than-formative <br />[Abrahams el ai" 1995] discharges, By the model proposed <br />here, maximization of friction factor must be viewed as a cor- <br />ollary to channel and flow adjustments rather than as a cause <br />of them, as some extremal value theories have argued [Davies <br />and Slither/and, 1980, 1983; Abrahams el a/., 1995J, Flow may <br />still be critical at less than effective discharges; tumbling flow <br />over static large roughness elements tends to be at or near <br />critical [Morris. 1968]. Under these conditions, however, flow <br />and channel geometry are not necessarily in equilibrium. so <br />channel geometry is a relict of some more formative discharge. <br />In contrast to step-pool channels, which preserve bed mor- <br />phologies developed at critical flow, antidune structures gen- <br />erated near critical flow in sand,bed systems are typically de- <br />stroyed as flows wane, although an internal antidune <br />stratification may be preserved [Middlelon, 1965; Hand el ai" <br />1969]. This erasure of bed forms occurs because sand-bed <br />streams tend to be competent over a much wider range of <br />flows; hence bed morphology continues to adjust. In some <br />cases the standing wave/antidune flow structure is maintained <br />'as flows recede, although the amplitude and wavelength dimin- <br />ish mMkedly. I have observed tiny sequences of standing waves <br />in very shallow flows on the Oregon beach. Coarser gravel <br />channels are in between sand-bed and boulder-bed streams, <br />and a distinct relict antidune structure may be preserved as <br />gravel lenses [Foley, 1977] or transverse ribs [Boothroyd and <br />Ashley, 1975; Church and Gilbert, 1975; Rusland G051in, 1981J, <br />Jia [1990J argued that the equilibrium bed morphology for <br />sand channels tends to minimize Froude number. This conclu- <br />s;on was derived from computer simulations of channels in the <br />subcritical flow regime, mostly below the 0.01 slope threshold, <br />In these simulations, where the slope equaled or exceeded <br />0.01. the minimum Froude number for the equilibrium channel <br />approached 1.0 (cf, Figures 3 and 4 and Table 1 offia [1990]), <br />The clustering of empirical points close to the threshold, as <br />opposed to the active-bed lines, in Figure 4 similarly suggests <br />that the Froude number wiJI not exceed one for a given set of <br />flow conditions. <br />In sand.bed streams, oscillation around critical flow occurs <br /> <br />(15) <br /> <br />in both time (i,e" Figure 2b) and space (i,e" longitudinal se- <br />quences of standing waves), but in boulder,bed and bedrock <br />channels the oscillation occurs primarily in space, as the result <br />of longitudinal accelerations and decelerations through the <br />critical threshold. This is well illustrated in the paleohydraulie <br />reconstructions of the Bonneville Floods [O'Connor, 1993J, <br />Kieffer's [1987] detailed study of the hydraulics of rapids in the <br />Grand Canyon also demonstrates this spatial variation, al- <br />though she points out that flow may, vary temporally because of <br />surges and pulses similar to those observed in sand-bed <br />streams. Release of water from breaking standing waves may <br />produce unsteady flow, even if bed forms are not destroyed. <br />Further validation of this hypothesis poses logistical but not <br />technical problems. Needed are instantaneous measurements <br />of velocities and depths for cross sections representing a range <br />of stream gradients and types, under high flow conditions when <br />bed load transport is active. Instantaneous measurements are <br />required because of the strongly unsteady nature of high flows, <br />The primary logistical problems are access to high flows in <br />steep channels and accurate measurements of velocity and <br />depth in channels undergoing rapid bed deformation and sed- <br />iment tninsport. Examination of lItream JjA\lge flilQOn-'lt U\ I~"n. <br />t1ty sitos with high Proude number flows provides a first cut at <br />caodidate sites [Wahl, 1993J, <br />From a practical standpoint an assumption of critical flow <br />would dramatically simplify the many problems associated with <br />predicting how floods behave in steep channels. Assumption of <br />critical flow would essentially replace the standard resistance <br />equations, such as Manning's or Chezy's, with the equation <br />v = (gd)O,'- Establishing the discharge of paleofloods in <br />steep channels for hazard assessments, climate change analy- <br />ses, or land-use planning could then proceed by calculating the <br />velocity directly from the depth of flow, as determined from <br />flood deposit stratigraphy or shear stress considerations. In <br />fact, this assumption has already been proposed on empirical <br />grounds alone, with good results [Ai/en, 1982, p, 411J, <br /> <br />(16) <br /> <br />Conclusions <br /> <br />Interactions between the water surface an-d bed forms are <br />proposed to maintain competent flows in mobile channels to <br />Fr :5 1, Competent, high-gradient streams with beds ranging <br />from sand to boulders typically achieve an equilibrium adjust- <br />ment between the flow, sediment transport, and channel mor- <br />phology at or near critical flow, Under this unique hydraulic <br />condition the maximum amount of water can be transmitted <br />downstream for the available energy, and the tendency for flow <br />acceleration is balanced by development of bed forms and Row <br />structures that offset that tendency by dissipating flow energy, <br />The adjustment to a critical flow tbresbold is a dynamic one, <br />involving feedbacks between tbe free surface,' bed configura- <br />tion, flow resistance, and the sediment transport rate, In ,and- <br />bed channels this dynamic equilibrium generates pulsating flow <br />with a concomitant nonuniform and unsteady flow field. In <br />coarser~grained systems this oscillatory flow pattern is -sup- <br />pressed somewhat by the lower bed load transport rates, more <br />cbaotic structure of both the bed and the flow, and the impor- <br />tance of particle interactions; that is, collisions. imbrication. <br />and lodging of very large particles influence the hcd forms, The <br />hypothesis that high-gradient streams adjust their hydraulics <br />according to a common principle deserves further empirical <br />and laboratory testing. If validated, it offers a simple. useful <br />means of predicting flow hydraulics in mountain stream" <br />