Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Presently Harvard Gulch and Dry Gulch are considered to have a high <br />flood damage potential. The preservation of the floodplain will <br />serve, at least, to maintain the present level of damage potential <br />while any improvements will reduce or minimize the flood damage <br />potential. Reducing the flood hazard potential can be accomplished <br />through structural improvements to culverts and channels, flood <br />proofing and an operational and effective floodplain management <br />program. <br /> <br />BIBLIOGRAPHY <br /> <br />1. Flood Insurance Study, City of Denver, Federal Emergency <br />Management Agency. Study currently in progress. <br /> <br />2. Topographic Mapping, Harvard Gulch and West Harvard Gulch, <br />2-Foot Contour Interval, Scale: 1"=100', Urban Drainage and <br />Flood Control District. Aerial Photography flown May 24, 1978. <br />Prepared by Delta Aerial Surveys, Inc., Denver, Colorado. <br /> <br />3. "Harvard Gulch Flood Control Project," Journal of the Irri- <br />gation and Drainage Division, ASCE, by Kenneth R. Wright, <br />March 1967. <br /> <br />4. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, Volumes I & II, Urban <br />Drainage and Flood Control District, March 1969. <br /> <br />5. Topographic Mapping, Englewood, Colorado, and Fort Logan, <br />Colorado, 7~ Minutes Quadrangles, U.s. Geological Survey, <br />1965. <br /> <br />6. HEC-II Water Surface Profiles, Computer Program 723-X6-L202A, <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, <br />Davis, California, December 1968. <br /> <br />-8- <br />