My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10207
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10207
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:22 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:58:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
503
County
Jefferson
Community
Unincorporated Jefferson County
Stream Name
Woman Creek, Walnut, Upper Big Dry and Rock Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Drainage & Flood Control Master Plan - Rocky Flats Plant
Date
4/1/1992
Designation Date
9/1/1999
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />For this analysis, the basin areas and centroids were determined by using a Graphic Design <br />System (GDS) computer drafting program and 1" = 500' scale maps (Scharf & Associates, <br />1987). The basin lengths and land slopes were hand-measured on the same mapping. The <br />existing condition percent imperviousness was estimated by examination of 1" = 100' scale <br />maps for the plant site (Scharf & Associates, 1987) and 1" = 2000' maps (USGS, 1965) for <br />the areas outside the plant site. The mapped data were verified by site observations. The <br />future condition percent imperviousness was taken from the approved UDFCD Big Dry <br />Creek master drainage plan (Greiner Engineering, 1986). The value of 98 percent <br />imperviousness for the future condition of the Core Area is conservative, but considered <br />appropriate for the future condition master planning effort. <br /> <br />SWMM was developed by the Environmental Protection Agency and modified by Missouri <br />River Division of the USACE. A portion of the model was later modified to be specifically <br />used with CUHP. This version is called UDSWM2-PC by UDFCD; however, the generic <br />term "SWMM" will be used in this report. <br /> <br />SWMM accepts the individual basin hydrograph information calculated by CUHP and routes <br />the hydrograph downstream through conveyance elements (e.g., channels, culverts, detention <br />basins). The routing is based on a kinematic wave approach using Manning's equation. <br /> <br />The specific input to the SWMM model includes sub-basin hydrographs generated by <br />CUHP; the connectivity of the conveyance elements, shown on Figure IV -1; and the length, <br />bottom width, side slopes, channel slope, and Manning's "n" of channel elements, shown in <br />Tables IV-3 and IV-4. The SWMM model element locations are shown in Figure IV-2, <br />sheets 1 and 2. <br /> <br />The soil infiltration characteristics were determined by examination of Soil Conservation <br />Service soil maps (SCS, 1975) and UDFCD recommended values. The soils are of three <br />general types; soils in the upland areas west of the Core Area have high infiltration rates, <br />soils in the steep valleys that drain to the creeks have low infiltration rates, and soils in the <br />creek bottoms have medium infiltration rates. <br /> <br />The SWMM output consists of tabulated storm hydrographs and flow depths for channel <br />elements, and tabulated outflow hydrographs and storage volumes for detention elements. <br />The channel element length and slopes were calculated using 1" = 500' maps (Scharf & <br />Associates, 1987). <br /> <br />The surface retention characteristics were estimated using the recommended UDFCD range <br />of values as a guide. Flat areas were assigned a higher retention value than steep areas. <br /> <br />CUHP basin characteristic input variables are listed in Table III-l for all sub-basins. <br /> <br />The channel configurations were categorized into six general types. The configurations are <br />not exact, but rather are an idealized trapezoidal representation of the type of channel. <br /> <br />SWMM Model <br /> <br />The detention basin storage information was taken from preliminary stage-storage curves <br />calculated by Merrick & Company (Merrick & Company, 1991). The discharge <br />characteristics were calculated using a broad-crested weir equation with spillway <br />configuration information taken from the same mapping. <br /> <br />The original procedure for use of CUHP was to repeat the hydrograph derivations at each <br />basin design point. While generally satisfactory in its application, CUHP did not necessarily <br />differentiate between narrow channels and wide channels where floodplain storage took <br />place. <br /> <br />Imnlementation of Rocky Flats Plant COOP ISWMM Models <br /> <br />UDFCD subsequently adopted the SWMM (UDFCD, 1986) for routing of sub-basin <br />hydrographs downstream. Here, channel flow velocities and floodplain storage <br />characteristics are reflected. SWMM routing of the sub-basin hydrographs was used for the <br />Rocky Flats basin. <br /> <br />The hydrologic modelling of the drainages crossing Rocky Flats was done by separating the <br />area into three models - one for the Great Western Reservoir including Walnut Creek <br />drainage basin, another for the Standley Lake drainage basin including Woman Creek and <br />Upper Big Dry Creek, and the third for Rock Creek. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.