My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10200
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10200
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:20 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:58:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Community
Boulder County
Stream Name
Boulder Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Simplified Mountain Canyon Flash Flood Guidance for Boulder Creek
Date
3/1/1990
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
Sabol Consulting
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />reduction curve), and the <br />applied to each subbasin. <br />shown in Table 1. <br /> <br />6-hour rainf,a,l1 distributions were developed and <br />The 6-hour rainfall depths for each subbasin are <br /> <br />f <br />, <br /> <br />Three methods were used to estimate rainfall losses; 1) Green and Ampt <br />infiltration equation witt, a surface rl!tention loss, 2) Initial Loss plus <br />Uniform Loss Rate (IL+ULR), and 3) the CN method. The Green and Ampt infil- <br />tration parameters were estimated by pl:ocedures contained in the Maricopa <br />County, Arizona, Hydrologic Design Manual. A description of this rainfall <br />loss procedure and methods to estimate the parameters is contained in Appendix <br />A. The Green and Ampt infiltration equation is a three parameter model and is <br />a decay type function that is based on accumulated soil moisture and the <br />antecedent soil moisture condition. The paramet,~rs can be estimat,~d according <br />to soil texture classification. Based on field observation and experience. <br />the soil in the watershed was classed as loam. <br /> <br />[ <br /> <br />The IL+ULR parameters were estimated bJr the methods in the Maricopa <br />County Hydrologic Design Manual. Reports of: previous flood hydrology studies <br />in the watershed were researched and it vas found that a uniform loss rate of <br />1. 0 inch per hour and an initial loss of 0.05 inch has been used ('Iuller <br />Engineering Company, Inc., 1983). An uniform loss rate of 1.0 inch per hour <br />is jUdged to be too high and an initial loss of CI.05 inch is judged to be too <br />low. As a comparison. Mr. Fred BertIe, retired head of the USBR Flood Hydrol- <br />ogy Section, recently performed a flood study of Dillon Dam for the Denver <br />Water Department (BertIe, 1982). In that study, Mr. BertIe reconstituted <br />several historic storms in the Blue River basin. Those reconstitutions <br />resulted in uniform loss rates of about 0.25 to 0.40 inch per hour. It is <br />likely that the Blue River watershed would have loss rates comparable to the <br />Boulder watershed. <br /> <br />The SCS Curve Number (CN) method (BCS. 1972) was used for comparison. A <br />CN of 78 was selected as the "best" estimate and a CN of 68 was also used to <br />demonstrate the sensitivity of the CN method. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.