My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10167
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:12 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:56:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
299
County
Costilla
Community
Unincorporated Costilla County
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Floodplain Information Report - for the Rio Grande, Trinchera Creek, Culebra Creek, Colstilla Creek, and Selected Tributaries in Costilla County
Date
3/1/1989
Designation Date
11/1/1989
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.3 Stream Gaqe Data <br /> <br />A hydrologic analysis was performed to determine 100-year <br />peak flows on streams in Costilla County. The principal data <br />sources were the USGS publication. Technical Manual No.1. <br />Manual for Estimatinq Flood Characteristics of Natural-Flow <br />Streams in Colorado (TM-l). published in 1976. and a USDA Soil <br />Conservation Service (SCS) hydrologic analysis for the Town of <br />San Luis. prepared as a part of a 1979 flood control project <br />study that was conducted by the SCS. These two sources were. <br />in turn. principally based on analyses of gage records for <br />sites in Costilla county. <br /> <br />TM-l included gage analyses for five (5) stream gages in <br />Costilla County. These gages are listed in Table 4. The SCS <br />analyzed five (5) gages also. Three of those gages had already <br />been analyzed in TM-l. The results of their analyses are <br />listed in Table 5. <br /> <br />Since it had not been analyzed for TM-l or the SCS study. <br />one more gage was studied by the CWCB. The gage on Trinchera <br />Creek below Smith Reservoir was felt to be important because it <br />had over 50 years of record and because it provided data <br />further downstream on any of the three major tributaries than <br />any other gage in the county. Even though it is located below <br />a reservoir. the gage provided helpful data. <br /> <br />The site is actually downstream of two reservoirs. Mountain <br />Home Reservoir is upstream of Smith Reservoir on the mainstem <br />of Trinchera Creek (see Figure 4). Sangre de Cristo Creek does <br />not flow through Mountain Home Reservoir. but joins Trinchera <br />Creek at Smith Reservoir. farther downstream. Sangre de Cristo <br />Creek actually contributes a much larger drainage area to the <br />Trinchera Creek basin above Smith Reservoir than does the <br />Trinchera Creek mainstem. <br /> <br />The question of what role either of these reservoirs might <br />play in flood flows on Trichera Creek can. however. be put <br />aside. As is discussed in Section 3.4 (Reservoirs). ultimately I <br />no flood storage credit was given to any of the reservoirs in <br />Costilla County for the purposes of this study. 61 square miles <br />on the Trinchera Creek mainstem are tributary to Mountain Home <br />Reservoir. These were not subtracted from the total drainage <br />area at the gage below Smith Reservoir (396 square miles). The <br />calculated 100-year flow of 1.560 c.f.s.. based on the <br />assumptions described in Section 3.4. provided useful <br />information for the discharge prOfile for Trinchera Creek west <br />of the foothills. <br /> <br /> <br />Additionally one gage that had been analyzed for TM-l. the <br />gage on Costilla Creek above Costilla Darn in New Mexico. was <br />restudied by the CWCB. For reasons that are unclear. several <br />years of record on that stream. inCluding an exceptionally <br />large flow in 1954. were not made part of the TM-1 analysis. <br /> <br />-20- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.