My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10164
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:11 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:56:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Arapahoe
Community
Littleton
Stream Name
Slaughterhouse Gulch
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning
Date
4/1/1974
Prepared For
Littleton, DRCG, DHUD
Prepared By
Frasier & Gingery, Inc.
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION III <br /> <br />HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />A thorough hydrological investigation has been completed on <br />the Slaughterhouse Gulch drainage basin. As required by the <br />contract, flood hydrographs were determined for the 2-5~lO-lOO- <br />year storm frequencies. In the hydrologic evaluation, only <br />the projected land uses were considered. Hydrographs were <br />computed to define the peak rate of runoff at the selected <br />design points, as well as the volume of runoff characteristic <br />of the storm frequency and the type of development within the <br />basin. The method used to compute the flood hydrographs is <br />the Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure. This method is well <br />outlined in the Runoff section of the Urban Storm Drainage <br />Criteria Manual (USDCM) and, therefore, will not be discussed <br />In detail in this report. <br /> <br />A. DESIGN POINTS <br /> <br />To facilitate the evaluation of intermediate points along the <br />gulch, four design points were selected within the study area. <br />These design points permitted a more detailed evaluation of <br />the flooding problems within the basin and along the approxi- <br />mately 1.75 mile study reach. <br /> <br />Sheet 2 of 8 in Appendix B, Basin Boundaries, shows the location <br />of the design points and the corresponding subbasins. The basin <br />boundaries have been determined primarily on the basis of <br />natural topography, field inspection and storm sewer locations. <br /> <br />Table I provides the physical data for each of the subbasins <br />and the channel reach between each design point. The peak <br />storm runoff rate was computed for developed conditions at <br />each design point and is provided on discharge probability <br />profile charts which will be discussed in a later section. <br /> <br />B. BASIN PARAMETERS <br /> <br />To facilitate the computation of the design hydrographs for <br />each of the selected storm frequencies, each basin must be <br />physically described in terms of tributary area, basin length, <br />length to basin centroid, degree of perviousness throughout <br />the basin, and the selection of other representative coeffi- <br />cients typical of the area. This information has been deter- <br />mined for each of the basins and is tabulated in Table II. All <br />the physical parameters of the basin have been measured from <br />available USGS quadrant maps. Information on the degree of <br />development within the basin, as well as the type of land use, <br />has been obtained from available aerial photographs and field <br />inspection. The projected development information has been <br />determined from information on available planning and zoning <br />maps. <br /> <br />111-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.