Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />To develop the runoff model, the Sand Creek basin was divided into 270 sub- <br />basins and 262 gutter reaches. The basin parameters for present basin conditions <br />were obtained from a quadrangle map having a scale of 1 to 24,000. Gutter di- <br />mensions were based on estimates made during a field investigation. Impervious <br /> <br />Water surface profiles were computed using the Corps of Engineers HEC-2 back- <br />water computer program. The cross sections used in the analysis were developed <br />from topographic maps with 2 foot contour intervals. The Sand Creek cross sections <br />cover a 20-mi1e reach of channel and extend from Burlington Ditch (Section 2.1) <br />upstream to Arapahoe County Road No. 18 (Section 124.0). Cross sections were <br /> <br />areas were estimated from 1974 aerial photos. <br /> <br />To obtain basin parameters for the future basin conditions, a projected land <br />use map was prepared by using present zoning maps in conjunction with present <br />growth trends. The hydrologic effects of this future development were evaluated <br />with the runoff model by utilizing impervious areas consistent with the future <br />development. Table 2-1 of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Ref. 1) was <br /> <br />located at close intervals around bridges, culverts, and in other critical areas <br /> <br />so that the effects of these structures on the backwater could be better evaluated. <br /> <br />Form losses due to contraction and expansion of flow in channel cross <br /> <br />sections were computed using coefficients of 0.1 and 0.3 for gradual transitions. <br /> <br /> <br />For abrupt transitions coefficients of 0.3 and 0.6 were used. <br /> <br />used to estimate impervious areas associated with various types of development. <br /> <br />Channel roughness factors for various segments of the sections were selected <br /> <br />Rainfall values obtained from the Weather Bureau publication previously <br />mentioned were adjusted for depth-area and depth-duration relationships as dis- <br />cussed in the same publication. The 500-year precipitation values were obtained <br />by extrapOlation. Infiltration losses of .5 inch/hour were based on the hourly <br />loss values as published by the Missouri River Division in a comprehensive loss <br /> <br />on the basis of examination of available aerial photography. The following <br /> <br />Manning's "n" values were assigned: <br /> <br />Channel <br />Field and Open Overbanks <br />Tree and Underbrush <br />Areas of Urban Development <br /> <br />0.036 - 0.044 <br />0.035 - 0.045 <br />0.05 - 0.06 <br />0.10 <br /> <br />Backwater computations for determination of flood profiles started at the <br />Burlington Ditch weir, where critical depth conditions were assumed to prevail. <br />Losses through bri dgesand cu1 verts were based upon ass umed parti a 1 obstruction <br />of flow areas due to substantial collection of flood debris on the piers and <br />submerged low steel. It is assumed that debris would have the equivalent effect <br />of lowering low steel elevations by 2 feet and increasing the effective width <br />of each pier up to as much as 3 feet, depending upon the shape, spacing, and <br />size of the pier. Area reductions were also made in sections laid out through <br />urbanized areas. The overbank areas of a section were decreased to reflect the <br /> <br />study for the entire Missouri River Basin. <br />Backwater studies were developed along Sand Creek using surveyed cross- <br />section data taken during late 1974. The results of these backwater studies <br />were used to develop the unsteady flow routing model for Sand Creek from the <br />Arapahoe-Elbert County line to the mouth. The surface runoff model was broken <br />into ten major subareas for input into the routing mode. <br />Discharge profiles for present and future basin conditions are shown on <br /> <br />Figures 1, 2 and 3. <br /> <br />Hydraulic Analysis <br /> <br />An analysis of the hydraulic characteristics of Sand Creek was carried out <br /> <br /> <br />to provide estimates of the elevation of the 100-year flood at selected locations. <br /> <br />actual amount of unblocked overbank area available to flow. The reduction of <br /> <br />flow through the section was necessary to obtain realistic overbank velocities <br />and head loss determinations. <br />