My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10141
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
9001-10000
>
FLOOD10141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:12:05 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 4:55:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency Bulletin 17A
Date
3/1/1977
Prepared By
USWRC
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C. Future Studies <br />This guide is designed to meet a current, ever-pressing demand that <br />the Federal Government develop a coherent set of procedures for accurately <br />defining flood potentials as needed in programs of flood damage abatement. <br />Much additional study and data are required before the twin goals of <br />accuracy and consistency will be obtained. It is hoped that this guide <br />contributes to this effort by defining the essential elements of a <br />coherent set of procedures for flood frequency determination. Although <br />selection of the analytical procedures to be used in each step or element <br />of the analysis has been carefully made based upon a review of the <br />literature, the considerable practical experience of Work Group members, <br />and special studies conducted to aid in the selection process, the need <br />for additonal studies is recognized. Following is a list of some additional <br />needed studies indentified by the Work Group: <br />1. Selection of distribution and fitting procedures <br />(a) Continued study of alternative distributions and <br />fitting procedures is believed warranted. <br />(b) Initially the Work Group had expected to find that <br />the proper distribution for a watershed would vary <br />depending upon watershed and hydrometeorological <br />conditions. Time did not permit exploration of <br />this idea. <br />(c) More adequate criteria are needed for selection <br />of a distribution. <br />(d) Development of techniques for evaluating <br />homogeneity of series is needed. <br />2. The identification and treatment of mixed distributions. <br />3. The treatment of outliers both as to identification and <br />computational procedures. <br />4. Alternative procedures for treating historic data. <br />5. More adequate computation procedures for confidence limits <br />to the Pearson III distribution. <br />6. Procedures to incorporate flood estimates from precipitation <br />into frequency analysis. <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.